Does the GOP Need to Change Its Stance on Immigration? : Photo Gallery
Does the GOP Need to Change Its Stance on Immigration? : Videos
Does the GOP Need to Change Its Stance on Immigration? : Latest News, Information, Answers and Websites
Conservatives Seem To Be Coming Around on Immigration | Elections
It is surprising that only about 70 percent of Hispanics opposed Romney. Charles Krauthammer says immigration is the only issue Republicans really need to change their position on following the election. The only part of this ...
Changing The Republican Party
1 day ago ... The going opinion seems to be that the Republicans lost because they need to change their position on immigration. Marco Rubio was in Iowa ...
Why do people deny that Obama and Romney are exactly the same on every level?
A politician is a politician is a politician.
If you think political stances matters you are an idiot.
All politicians are liars and idiots, anyone with a three digit IQ can see that.
Dont pretend religious views weight in, in the end nothing changes no matter which failure wins.
Answer: How are they the same on EVERY level?
They differ on gay marriage, DADT, abortion, the affordable health care act, immigration, Iraq, etc.
sure...Romney is more liberal than the average GOP, and he is more liberal on a lot of issues (i.e. NDAA, gun control, previous stances on abortion and gay rights)
but at the end of the day, were probably going to be equally as f****d, just by a different person.
Category: Religion & Spirituality
Is Mitt Romney the "complete conservative"?
Yes, I know his views have changed, I know hes "flip-flopped", and I know its recent. So, what? Ronald Reagan changed his positions on a lot of issues, not just abortion and the Department of Education.
But none of the other Republican candidates can claim that their "current" views are in line with the GOPs, either. Rudy Giuliani is a a social liberal; Mike Huckabee has spending and other domestic policy issues; John McCain has a history of moderatism, most notably his supports of immigration and campaign finance reforms; and Ron Paul isnt conservative so much as he is completely libertarian.
Yes, Romney has changed his stances; but isnt that exactly what Republicans have been hoping for all this time: that people all over will "change their minds" like Romney has? The GOP should be thrilled. After all, no zealot like a convert.
Read this article and tell me what you think.
http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=YmMxYTUyYzA1YTk2YzE5NGVmNjc0OGFjYWJmNzMzNjI=&p=1
Exactly my point, Mercer. Theres an old proverb that says "There are only two people who never change: the most wise, and the most foolish." Who exactly do we think were electing?
Answer: I don't claim to be conservative, so I can't judge whether Romney is the "complete conservative." I just wanted to say I thought it interesting how you make Romney's flip-flopping sound like a plus when John Kerry lost is bid for president in a large part do to being a flip-flopper, which Republicans at the time contended was inexcusable. Maybe it took another 4 years of President Bush to realize the drawbacks of someone who is "stuck in his ways."
Category: Other - Politics & Government
GOP Talks About Immigration Reform But Will It Change Its Tone?
Nov 13, 2012 ... Time to change their hardline approach to America's immigrants and ... Now, a few GOP members have the audacity to say "I told you so," like Sen. ... Jan Brewer (R) appeared to back away from her firm position that border ...
Rick Perrys TX is to the left of the Dream Act. Has the GOP changed its stance on illegal immigration?
Perry:
-supplies instate tuition for illegals
-supports laws that admit illegals to TX colleges before American citizens
-obstructed sanctuary city legislation
-prevented a vote on E-Verify
@Mr. Wolf - dude, nothing I said was wrong. Your boy, Governor Amnesty, let you down. Not my problem.
Answer: No , they have not.
Category: Politics
If employing illegals is illegal, why isnt funding them to be employed illegal?
"Trouble in the rancorous House began late Thursday night during debate of an agricultural spending bill, when the chamber broke out in shouts and howls over a move by Republicans to insert a provision on illegal immigration.
The GOP measure would have amended the agriculture bill to ensure that no funds could be used to employ or provide housing for illegal immigrants — about half of the 2.5 million workers on U.S. farms.
The move infuriated Democratic leaders, who saw it as a political maneuver to force their partys vulnerable freshman members to take a difficult vote that could be used against them next year on the campaign trail.
In a maneuver that recalled the high-handed tactics of House leaders from generations past, the Democrat lawmaker presiding over the chamber brought down his gavel, ending the vote, as Democrats appeared to be prevailing."
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-congress4aug04,1,3819854.story?page=1&track=rss
What do you think?
Answer: i agree with Rabid Frog
oh and did you see the article on McCain trying to hide his stance on illegal immigration because it is hurting his campaign he is not getting enough money , it said he is changing his course on immigration. i say he is hiding it for now .
Category: Immigration
Arent you all warm and tingly about Sean Hannity changing his mind on immigration?
He really does care about the plight of immigrants!
Wait, thats not why he changed his mind?
Answer: Hannity's (and the GOP's) stance to illegal immigration has always been a smokescreen for anti-immigration, legal as well as illegal.
Discovering that this actually did them damage, he'll happily flip on the matter. One day he'll decide that Gay Marriage was never a real issue and that some kind of gun control would make good sense.
Category: Politics
Republican Reconsideration of Immigration - Reason.com
Even if it's for the wrong reasons, it's good to see conservatives rethinking their position. ... Only after the border is secure, Republicans and conservatives have said, should any change in immigration policy be considered. ... I think it will be interesting if the enthusiasm among certain Republicans for immigration reform continues past the 2014 elections, which they will most likely do quite well in given the dynamics of off-presidential year elections combined with the ...
Is Mitt Romney the "complete conservative"?
Yes, I know his views have changed, I know hes "flip-flopped", and I know its recent. So, what? Ronald Reagan changed his positions on a lot of issues, not just abortion and the Department of Education.
But none of the other Republican candidates can claim that their "current" views are in line with the GOPs, either. Rudy Giuliani is a a social liberal; Mike Huckabee has spending and other domestic policy issues; John McCain has a history of moderatism, most notably his supports of immigration and campaign finance reforms; and Ron Paul isnt conservative so much as he is completely libertarian.
Yes, Romney has changed his stances; but isnt that exactly what Republicans have been hoping for all this time: that people all over will "change their minds" like Romney has? The GOP should be thrilled. After all, no zealot like a convert.
Read this article and tell me what you think.
http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=YmMxYTUyYzA1YTk2YzE5NGVmNjc0OGFjYWJmNzMzNjI=&p=1
Adam, can you tell me what exactly is wrong with Harvard? Should we be electing our president from the ranks of community college dropouts?
Think of it this way: George W. Bush went to school, came out with roughly the same IQ as he went in. Mitt Romney earned a joint MBA-law degree, hard to do even by Ivy League standards. Those millions of his? He earned every dollar himself. Dont we want someone that smart handling the economy and the federal budget?
Sean, I dont know if its that youve just read Mormon Doctrine too many times or what, but that is not what the LDS Church teaches. Elder McConkie offered that as his opinion. It has never been official doctrine of the church, and its certainly not something taught in Sunday School or Seminary classes.
Answer: Our country is at war now and we need a true leader to guide us through the perilous times ahead. Mitt Romney is exactly the kind of person we need to run this country. Before any of us were born, we all lived together in Heaven with Heavenly Father. Some of us rebelled and started a war with those who were faithful . This event was called "The War in Heaven". Eventually the bad guys lost and became demons . the good guys won and were born with white skin here on Earth. Those who did not fight very hard or were indifferent were born on Earth with dark skin. The bravest of the brave leaders of the Lords Army were born here on Earth with White skin to good Mormon families.
During the war, Romney must have been one of the top Commanding Generals. Just look at his awe inspiring persona and strong Mormon family. Amerika needs General Romney to help us win the war on terror and bring Salvation to the world. Vote Romney in '08.
For more info , see your nearest Mormon.
Category: Politics
Is Mitt Romney the "complete conservative"?
Yes, I know his views have changed, I know hes "flip-flopped", and I know its recent. So, what? Ronald Reagan changed his positions on a lot of issues, not just abortion and the Department of Education.
But none of the other Republican candidates can claim that their "current" views are in line with the GOPs, either. Rudy Giuliani is a a social liberal; Mike Huckabee has spending and other domestic policy issues; John McCain has a history of moderatism, most notably his supports of immigration and campaign finance reforms; and Ron Paul isnt conservative so much as he is completely libertarian.
Yes, Romney has changed his stances; but isnt that exactly what Republicans have been hoping for all this time: that people all over will "change their minds" like Romney has? The GOP should be thrilled. After all, no zealot like a convert.
Read this article and tell me what you think.
http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=YmMxYTUyYzA1YTk2YzE5NGVmNjc0OGFjYWJmNzMzNjI=&p=1
Googie, Im not sure what you mean by "at this point". Were less than a month from the first And second nominating contests for the GOP. If you want to defeat Hillary Clinton, then youd best get interested in a hurry.
Dino, one of the advantages of having $250 million of your own money is that youre no slave to special interests. Mitt Romney has never used public office to support the rights of corporations anymore than he has used it to support his church.
In his religion speech, he promised to serve no cause except "the common cause" of the United States of America. You can be sure corporate America is covered by that pledge as well. Their interests are served only as long as its in the best interests of the country itself.
Answer: Theres no such thing as filp-floping...Its called changing your mind after youve gotten better information on an issue..
To answer your question, Yes he is the complete conservative
Category: Elections
Compare Ron Pauls stance on Immigration(link below) to Mitt Romneys and Obamas?
http://www.ronpaul2012.com/the-issues/immigration/
I think Ron Paul has the best solution to fix immigration issues. Heres a snippet from his website:
"A nation without borders is no nation at all.
It just doesn’t make sense to fight terrorists abroad while leaving our front door unlocked.
Unfortunately, for far too long, neither major political party has had the courage to do what is necessary to tackle the problem.
Instead, we’re presented with so-called “solutions” that involve amnesty proposals or further restricting Americans’ civil liberties through programs like REAL ID.
Ron Paul opposes both of these schemes and believes they will only make illegal immigration and the problems associated with it worse. He has been proud to see states exercising their Tenth Amendment rights and protecting their citizens by refusing to comply with the unconstitutional REAL ID law."
JRHRLH: If you took a moment and used the link I put,you would know his immigration plan (that was just a short snippet)
Anonymous: thanks for simplifying and clearing the jargon off of it.
Answer: Immigration is a thorny question the GOP candidates fear to be asked about.
Mitt Romney talked about some half-ass solutions that he later flipped flopped on a dozen times.
Romney understands how deciding of a factor this issue can be and does not want to risk latino voters,in particular.
All GOP candidates fear that if they talk about plans that fix immigration from its roots,
they'll stand no chance against President Obama who is the champion of "immigration appeasement" with his amnesty solutions that only keep the status quo at best and will never solve the problem.Newt Gingritch talked about another amnesty plan similar to president Obama's.
Only ONE MAN begs to differ: Ron Paul.
Ron Paul has no problem running the risk of losing some immigrant voters and has not changed his stance to avoid this or please anyone for votes or any political gain. This is Because Ron Paul is bold,consistent and a true American. He cares about fixing the issues from their roots regardless of voting outcome. But don't misunderstand his immigration policies;they'are actually immigrant-friendly.
He wants to eliminate the need for considering illegal immigration in the first place by simplifying legal immigration that also makes sure that when immigrants do come ,there are resources to cater for them.That way, they don't end up a burden and hopefuls with broken dreams as is the case with current situation.
Ron Paul believes that no one should face any discrimination because of their status as a minority.
Ron Paul on immigration is the best GOP candidate for 2012 elections
Category: Elections
4. How the 2012 Election Will Change the - Slate Magazine
6 days ago ... They fight for change, and eventually conservatives succumb. But it ... The defeat of 2012 is forcing Republicans to rethink what they stand for. ... Republicans have suffered a defeat, and they're seeing, in polling trends, signs of trouble ahead. ... They're trying to figure out what the GOP must do to restore its ...
DOES THE GOP NEED TO CHANGE ITS STANCE ON IMMIGRATION? - Newsits ...
As the Republican Party regroups and reflects after the 2012 election, there's no shortage of people looking for someone or something to blame for the party's disappointing results. Many say extreme rhetoric on topics such as immigration ...
what is the next move for the Republican party?
Too many people wanting free stuff.. hahaah I bet if they started handing out free stuff they might win an election or two, but they are so cheap that is a kunundrum ahhahaha so whats next....
Answer: What Republicans need to do is expand on their electorate. They can no longer rely on a majority of the vote from Whites, because the minority population is vastly increasing and it's only a matter of time before Whites are no longer a majority in the U.S. The GOP MUST reach out to Latinos in particular because they are one of, if not the fastest growing groups of people in the country plus, both Republicans and Latinos in general stand on the same side on a lot of social issues, so it's a no-brainer. The major thing that's keeping them apart is the GOP's stance on immigration reform, but after this hard loss I'm sure the Republicans now realize they have no choice but to seek more favorable immigration reform policy. I don't think they should change or compromise any of their core beliefs, but they absolutely MUST reach out to minorities and include them if they are to stay relevant in future American politics.
I'm not saying this is all they should do, but I think it will help a lot.
Category: Elections
Republican Headliners to GOP: We Need to Change Approach to ...
Increasingly, prominent Republican figures are making similar assessments, recognizing that the GOP's anti-immigration reputation will have to change if the Party is to ever gain votes from a rising Latino vote demographic. ... if Romney loses, “Immigration was a fatal blunder” will be one of the top post-mortem explanations: “It's been one of the most consistent — and for Republicans, alarming — features of 2012 polling: Romney is getting blown out with Latino voters.
Rubio: GOP's 'Deport Grandma' Immigration Stance Must Change
5 days ago ... Rubio: GOP's 'Deport Grandma' Immigration Stance Must Change ... "It's really hard to get people to listen to you … if they think you want to deport ... immigrants legal rights, Rubio said any reforms will have to address the ...
Can the GOP Change on Immigration? « Commentary Magazine
That has, in turn, led to speculation about the Republican Party changing its tune on immigration, an issue which is widely — and probably quite rightly — viewed as a deal breaker for the majority of Hispanic voters when GOP candidates ... who obsess about the issue have blown the dangers that stem from immigration out of proportion and sound like 19th century “Know Nothings,” most Republican primary voters who care about the issue take a less extreme position.
Would you consider Tom Tancredo for president?
Colorado Congressman Tancredo Announces 2008 White House Campaign
DES MOINES, Iowa — Criticizing other GOP candidates as weak in their efforts to stop illegal immigration, Colorado Rep. Tom Tancredo announced Monday he would seek the Republican presidential nomination.
"The political elite in Washington have chosen to ignore this phenomenon," he said.
Tancredo, a congressman who has gained prominence in recent years for his staunch stance against illegal immigration, said immigration would be the primary focus of his campaign.
He said he would not enter the race if he thought one of the leading candidates was sufficiently conservative on the issue.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,263366,00.html
Answer: I don't see another choice right now. The media calls the man a one-issue candidate. It's a valid point in as much as this is what he is pointing to every chance he gets. IMMIGRATION and BORDER SECURITY are the issues that may well determine our future. People talk about the economics of the situation. I've heard people talk about racial issues, stating that he's just anti-Hispanic. I've heard people claim he's trying to make sure that the GOP base, which they claim is rich white folks, maintains a majority or at least a strong minority, stating that immigrants will just dillute the voting power of this group. My point is that we have laws. We need to enforce those laws. If we want to change the laws that is fine, but until those laws are changed we'd do well to simply enforce the existing laws vigorously. Tancredo understands that. I found a shirt the other day that expresses my thoughts perfectly.
http://www.cafepress.com/buy/tancredo/-/pv_design_prod/p_2339669.121398460/pNo_121398460/id_18569982/fpt_/opt_/c_360/pg_3
I love the quote that we are a nation of laws, not a community of suggestions. Tancredo understands that!
Category: Immigration
Republicans & “Minorities” | Talking Philosophy
As such, it makes sense that the practical Republicans would begin to change their professed views on the matter of immigration. After all, they believe that doing so will increase their chances of being elected (or ... Romney was able to make inroads against Obama's lead, but Obama did well with single women, making this a demographic that Republicans will need to win over in future elections. It is, of course, tempting to criticize politicians for doing this. After all, if ...
Can the GOP Change on Immigration? « Commentary Magazine
Nov 9, 2012 ... Can the GOP Change on Immigration? ... Nevertheless, any expectation that the bulk of party members will change their stance on the issue is probably ... Sooner or later the government will have to recognize their status and ...
Who are your top 3 choices for GOP candidate that are currently running? And why.?
I kind of like McCain, and Huckabee, but am not sure of some of their stances.
Answer: I have not determined as yet but this I can say....
McCain is simply out of the question for me, and I don't believe he is going to get the nomination (especially after this trash immigration bill he wrote with Chappaquiddick Ted).
Rudy is going to quickly take a massive dive in the polls. What has held him up so far was the Christian right being undecided about support for him, and his higher probability of beating Hillary. With Dobson coming out so strongly against him (and I am sure many more soon to follow) he will have little chance at the nomination and if he were to get it would likely lead to a third party vote for a great many of the Republican base.
Romney is still a possibility for me, but am not real excited about him as yet.
Huckabee? Eh...so far not so thrilled...will have to see.
Hunter, Tancrado (sp?), Paul are great but not sure if any is viable (although if one were to win one of the first primaries in NH or Iowa...that may change things quick).
It seems Gingrich may throw in soon, as well as Fred Thompson...either of which is much better than McCain...I need to hear more from both to decide if they would be the best choice though (high hopes for Thompson).
Category: Elections
The GOP is going extinct? (thrill most Americans) :)?
lets face it, the highly religious, the ones we here have the biggest problem with, is the base of the Republican Party. given this, news of its imminent demise should thrill most Atheists. and make no mistake, barring a gargantuan shift in policies and rhetoric, they are absolutely on the path towards extinction.
its common knowledge that the GOP is an old, white party. while not an absolute, that is an accurate enough description of the Republican Party today. two trends to keep in mind here. one, old people tend to die at a faster rate than young people. two, white people are shrinking as a percentage of the electorate. they are running out of supporters, and its happening quicker than many thought.
take yesterdays election. President Obama won over 90% of the black vote and 70% of the latino and asian vote. Romney did well with seniors and whites overall. meanwhile, the country is getting browner. the GOP may end up becoming a whites only club, a nativist and pale collection of isolationists who choose to ignore the changing demographics of the country. worse, they may choose to keep it this way. if they choose this path, their extinction is all but guaranteed. their option would be to abandon their social issues, immigration policies, and economic austery programs and to open up their tent through real policy change.
anyone wanna bet which way they go?
for Atheists, either way is a win. if the GOP becomes irrelevant then the power of the religious right goes with it. if they truly make changes to make more people inclusive and begin to part with their religious base Atheists will celebrate. yesterdays election is better for Atheists than most people would think.
Answer: I've been waiting for the sensible Republicans to regain control of the party for years.
Too many right-wing religious whackos have been given too much slack for years.
I hope that the GOP, as its current power structure stands, will disappear.
I hope that the GOP, without the religious nonsense and intrusive social stances, will disappear so that it can attract the sensible Democrats, who only vote Democratic because of the extreme social stances of the GOP but really identify more with the fiscal responsibility wing of the GOP, will come back into the fold.
Category: Elections
By hardening his immigration stances, is Romney risking alienating Hispanic voters in Florida and Nevada?
Hispanics are Americas fastest-growing racial demographic.
Republicans cant afford to alienate them in key swing states, since they tip elections.
Could Romney win the GOP primary only to have Hispanic voters go for Obama in droves next year?
Answer: It depends on what he says when those people are in his audiences. He probably is not speaking to them at the moment. So I am sure he is delivering a message they would not approve of. When he gets down there and speaks to the Mexicans, his message will change.
Category: Politics
Romney needs at least 40% of the Hispanic vote to win, will his comments on the 100 bill $ fence?
Hurt him???? Can he redeem himself???
He needs to win places like Texas and New Mexico, where the Hispanic vote really counts.
Answer: He'll get Texas anyway.
As for the Hispanic vote in general, the GOP generally takes an immigration stance that is 1) counter-productive to their election prospects and 2) inconsistent with the rest of their message.
Someone who truly believes in small government and individual liberty would open up the borders and provide full amnesty to essentially all currently illegal immigrants.
Gary Johnson took a pro-immigration stand, and for that and other reasons he wasn't allowed into the debates, and thus couldn't keep up in the GOP nomination race, and thus jumped to the Libertarian Party. Fred Karger, the first openly gay presidential candidate in U.S. history, remains in the GOP nomination race despite similar setbacks. If Romney wants to win the Hispanic vote in the general election, he'll have to change his rhetoric to a pro-liberty and thus pro-immigration stance. He can still win the whole election without doing that, though, if he doesn't alienate the Hispanic vote too far below 40%, but it will be harder for him then. Just don't expect any changes in rhetoric until IF and when he wins the nomination. He could still lose the nomination to Ron Paul if there's a brokered convention.
Category: Politics
Republican Immigration Reform Is a Thing Now -- Daily Intel
The most convenient argument for Republicans is that it is — they can move left on immigration, change nothing else whatsoever, and watch the Latino votes roll in. Krauthammer today: A problem fixable with a single policy ...
Now What? Immigration Edition | Center for Immigration Studies
The question for conservatives and Republicans is what, if any, adjustments ... way of avoiding reconsideration of other parts of the GOP message more in need of ... The GOP can change its stance on immigration and embrace lower numbers ...
What Republicans need tell Latinos about immigration | Fox News
6 days ago ... Republicans need to make the case that their immigration agenda is motivated by a desire to ... Thus, it's the rapidly changing economic demographics, not ethnic ... Reducing immigration will help Republicans because it lowers ... to stop allowing Democrats to define their position on immigration as being ...
Immigration reform more likely, but still challenging - The Maddow ...
Republican leaders are starting to sing a new tune; bipartisan talks that were scrapped in 2010 have been renewed; and by all accounts, President Obama intends to push aggressively for a comprehensive bill, which will enjoy considerable public support. The prospects for ... Not to mention that there are still a lot of prominent Republicans insisting that all they need is to stop demonizing immigrants; they don't need to change their policy positions at all. 1 vote. Reply ...
Why do you support Barack Obama?
It has been proven that Obama has a close relationship with William Ayers - an admitted domestic terrorist and Rasheed Khalidi - former spokeman for the PLO...and that they are not just names from his past or "people from the neighborhood"...and that he has intentionally covered up and misrepresented his relationship with both of them.
There are countless sound bytes of Obama expressing ideas and intentions that very closely resemble, if not mirror exactly, socialist fundamentals. He demonstrates, at best, a misunderstanding of the means by which a capitalistic society operates and, at worst, contempt and a blatant disregard for the very foundations upon which our society and economy -- and consequently our freedom are based.
He has demonstrated a stance on an issue that many people feel strongly about -- abortion, that is more radical and questionable than virtually any other legislator by refusing to support a measure that would have only worked to guarantee that medical care would be provided to newborns born alive...and in addition by comparing the effects of becoming pregnant to the effects of contracting an STD.
There are scores and scores of other reasons and illustrations of why Barack Obamas intentions and motives should be called into question and why, at a minimum, his basic moral judgment and values should be placed under scrutiny.
After taking all of that into consideration and if you still support Barack Obama, my question is why? Do you actually have a rationally based argument that supports him as the best choice for president despite all of those concerns? If so, what is it? Or are you just one of those people that has been hypnotized by the "hope for change" slogan and think that something different than George Bush and the Republican party is automatically better by default?
Answer: Well, its basically because I'm being realistic. In this climate, if Sen. McCain were to pull off a narrow victory, possibly without even winning the popular vote, and with a Democratic majority in both Houses of Congress, he couldn't govern. Couldn't. Don't fool yourselves, he's not going to be able to get anything done, he will be a very lonely President. Obama, I can't say I'm sold on him, but, to some degree, I feel as if in this political climate that he could be more effective, he could be a screwball too, you don't know until they get in there, but, I feel like, given the climate, there is a far greater chance of his being able to govern effectively than with Sen. McCain. Regardless, I will respect the decision of the country.
That being said, I have a lot of respect for Sen. McCain, eight years ago, even four years ago, I would have voted for him. He was a very powerful Senator able to really get through some good compromise legislation for many years, but he basically sacrificed all that power when he backed down on the immigration bill. Whether you agreed with that bill or not, he basically allowed the right wing to, for lack of a better word, castrate him politically, all so that he could have a shot at the GOP nomination. Make no mistake, if elected, Sen. McCain will be a very lonely President, the Democrats are going to be bitter as hell, the center is largely disillusioned with him and the right wing never liked him. He won't be effective.
Obama could very well be a complete incompetent in way over his head. I don't know, I hope not. But, at the very least, I think with Obama, and particularly Biden, whom I have always liked, I think you have a chance to begin to turn the page on what has overall been a disastrous eight years of this administration.
Category: Elections
Is Mitt Romney the "complete conservative"?
Yes, I know his views have changed, I know hes "flip-flopped", and I know its recent. So, what? Ronald Reagan changed his positions on a lot of issues, not just abortion and the Department of Education.
But none of the other Republican candidates can claim that their "current" views are in line with the GOPs, either. Rudy Giuliani is a a social liberal; Mike Huckabee has spending and other domestic policy issues; John McCain has a history of moderatism, most notably his supports of immigration and campaign finance reforms; and Ron Paul isnt conservative so much as he is completely libertarian.
Yes, Romney has changed his stances; but isnt that exactly what Republicans have been hoping for all this time: that people all over will "change their minds" like Romney has? The GOP should be thrilled. After all, no zealot like a convert.
Read this article and tell me what you think.
http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=YmMxYTUyYzA1YTk2YzE5NGVmNjc0OGFjYWJmNzMzNjI=&p=1
How is believing that God calls prophets and produces scriptures in our day any more weird or cultish than in Christs day? Or Moses? In fact, isnt that exactly why they had so much trouble in their times? Because they had "new prophets" and "new scriptures"?
You can call Mitt Romneys beliefs crazy if you want, but dont forget how "crazy" Christianity, and religion in general, truly is. Even if youre agnostic, you cant believe that being that being religious necessarily prohibits a person from possessing and exercising good judgment. Despite everything horrible thats been done in the name of "religion", many good things have been done as well.
Answer: I like Huckabee's hard-driving sincerity, and if he can become resolute on immigration and tough on crmininals, he might be the choice. There's something about him I can't help but like.
Romney might be okay. He's a little intense and I don't know if he's 100% sincere on everything. I like the way he sounds on some things also, and he's sharp/makes sense.
Category: Current Events
Immigration stance may put Rubio on GOP's short list
Nov 10, 2012 ... WASHINGTON — Some Republicans eager to look past Mitt ... Many Republicans oppose amnesty, but Rubio said it's time to change the conversation . ... who are trying to make it, and Republicans need to work harder than ever to ... for his running mate wants to do more than represent the Sunshine State.
Does the GOP Need to Change Its Stance on Immigration? - http://t.co/SXgDYzOe From: Newsits - Source: Newsits.com
Does the GOP Need to Change Its Stance on Immigration? - U.S. News & World Report: U.S. News & World ReportDoes ... http://t.co/QlJ3BSIQ From: 22FOURCOM - Source: twitterfeed
Does the GOP Need to Change Its Stance on Immigration? - U.S. News & World Report: U.S. News & World ReportDoes ... http://t.co/IZvnNCzb From: kamaluf - Source: twitterfeed
Does the GOP Need to Change Its Stance on Immigration? - U.S. News & World Report http://t.co/xDrhevA3 From: __Politics - Source: twitterfeed
Does the GOP Need to Change Its Stance on Immigration? - U.S. News & World Report http://t.co/L3gKF2g8 From: Headlines_USA - Source: twitterfeed
Does the GOP Need to Change Its Stance on Immigration? - U.S. News & World Report http://t.co/mBlzGv2D From: RuleofLawshows - Source: dlvr.it
Opinion: Does the GOP Need to Change Its Stance on Immigration? http://t.co/TuoH9Ftx From: USNewsWeekly - Source: twitterfeed
Does the GOP Need to Change Its Stance on Immigration? http://t.co/EPGGevAp From: Sumeshco - Source: dlvr.it
Does the GOP Need to Change Its Stance on Immigration?: After overwhelmingly losing the Latino vote, some say th... http://t.co/rC5IP3KX From: LovelyLioness23 - Source: twitterfeed
Does the GOP Need to Change Its Stance on Immigration?: After overwhelmingly losing the Latino vote, some say th... http://t.co/sMu1U2au From: manisharoy2 - Source: twitterfeed
Does the GOP Need to Change Its Stance on Immigration?: After overwhelmingly losing the Latino vote, some say th... http://t.co/8ssRLRoY From: ifbtut - Source: twitterfeed
Does the GOP Need to Change Its Stance on Immigration?: After overwhelmingly losing the Latino vote, some say th... http://t.co/0FJ004kU From: seputar_berita - Source: twitterfeed
#News Does the GOP Need to Change Its Stance on Immigration? http://t.co/2z1E7ufZ From: DAILY_BAGJA - Source: twitterfeed
Does the GOP Need to Change Its Stance on Immigration?: After overwhelmingly losing the Latino vote, some say th... http://t.co/xhkfUQ8H From: seputar_berita - Source: twitterfeed
Does the GOP Need to Change Its Stance on Immigration?: After overwhelmingly losing the Latino vote, some say the Republican Party mu... From: benwils09883463 - Source: twitterfeed