Analysis: Will The Debates Make a Difference? : Videos
Analysis: Will The Debates Make a Difference? : Photo Gallery
Analysis: Will The Debates Make a Difference? : Latest News, Information, Answers and Websites
Making a Difference in the Presidential Debate - WSJ.com
3 days ago ... When Mitt Romney takes the debate stage Wednesday night, he will need to ... edition of The Wall Street Journal, with the headline: Making a Difference in the Debate. .... The latest news and analysis delivered to your in-box.
Will the U.S. presidential debates make a difference? | Troy Media
... and it'll doubtless generate immense coverage, speculation and analysis. But will it matter? Looking back, perhaps there were only two occasions where debates made a difference. One was the John F. Kennedy-Richard ...
How will Democrats handle a Patraeus "Good News" Report in September (based on NYT report so far)?
In the New York Times this week, two noted and vocal critics of OIF, Michael O’Hanlon and Kenneth Pollack, analysts with the Left-leaning Brookings Institution, published an op-ed entitled “A War We Just Might Win.”
Having just returned from a fact-finding tour of Iraq, their op-ed notes, “After the furnace-like heat, the first thing you notice when you land in Baghdad is the morale of our troops. Today, morale is high. The soldiers and Marines... feel now they have the numbers needed to make a real difference.”
On the politics of Iraq, O’Hanlon and Pollack write, “Viewed from Iraq... the political debate in Washington is surreal. The Bush administration has over four years lost essentially all credibility. Yet now the administration’s critics, in part as a result, seem unaware of the significant changes taking place.”
Their analysis continues:“Here is the most important thing Americans need to understand:We are finally getting somewhere in Iraq, at least in military terms.
As two analysts who have harshly criticized the Bush administration’s miserable handling of Iraq, we were surprised by the gains we saw and the potential to produce not necessarily ‘victory’ but a sustainable stability that both we and the Iraqis could live with.”
Also this week, retired Army General Jack Keane testified before the House Armed Services Committee, telling them in no uncertain words, “Your actions here in the Congress appear to be in direct conflict with the realities on the ground where the trends are up and progress is being made. We are on the offensive and we have the momentum.”
That news was so distressing to Rep. Nancy Boyda (D-KS) that she walked out of the committee hearings during General Keane’s testimony, lamenting later that there was “only so much [she could tolerate] after so much of the frustration of having to listen to what we listened to.” She continued, “Those kinds of [encouraging] comments will in fact show up in the media and further divide
this country instead of saying, ‘Here’s the reality of the problem’.”
Of course, reality in the alternate universe of the Left dictates that down is up, in is out, left is right, black is white, falsehood is truth, pride is humility, red is blue and, particularly in the case of Iraq, good news is bad.
Adding insult to injury, more bad news for Demos: Marine General Jim Jones conducted a congressionally mandated study of Iraq’s security forces and returned with a favorable report.
This report, combined with the continuing decline of American and Iraqi casualties, has Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Leader Harry Reid very concerned that their “defeat and retreat” political folly may backfire.
Asked about the political implications should commanding Gen. David Petraeus report significant progress during his scheduled congressional testimony in September, House Majority Whip James Clyburn (D-SC) replied, “Well, that would be a real big problem for us, no question about that
replied, “Well, that would be a real big problem for us, no question about that.”
Good news out of Iraq is “a real big problem”? Guess that depends upon whose side you’re on.
Quote of the week
“We’re in a generation-long battle against terrorism, against al-Qa’ida-inspired terrorism, and this is a battle for which we can give no quarter. It’s a battle that’s got to be fought in military, diplomatic, intelligence, security, policing and ideological terms.” —Britain’s new prime minister, Gordon Brown
On cross-examination
“Liberals used to be the ones who argued that sending U.S. troops abroad was a small price to pay to stop genocide; now they argue that genocide is a small price to pay to bring U.S. troops home.” —Jonah Goldberg
The BIG lie
“This war is lost and the surge is not accomplishing anything.” —Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid
Answer: "not necessarily ‘victory’ but a sustainable stability that both we and the Iraqis could live with"
So are we finally defining victory or what? Are we willing to compromise on what was previously thought of as victory, or what?
Category: Politics
what do you make of all this? real responces only please!?
An issue that has been debated throughout this campaign is whose tax plan would be better for the "middle class," however you define that. Obama defines "middle class" as anyone making under $250,000. McCain doesnt really define it (remember the $5 million joke?). I dont want to define "middle class" so Im not really going to answer the title question of this blog post. But I can try to answer whose tax plan would cut taxes for middle-income tax units the most (as defined by the middle 20 percent of all tax units).
Using Tax Policy Center runs, its clear that if you ignore the health care plans, Obamas tax plan would give a larger tax cut to those in the middle-income groups than McCains would. Although TPCs runs do not account for any "trickle down" effect to those in the middle-income group, while that effect > 0, its not likely to make McCains tax plan more beneficial than Obamas tax plan when ignoring the health care plans. But those who have followed the issue of taxes in this campaign understand this. One of Obamas tax planks is to essentially redistribute via the tax code, whether you agree or disagree with that.
Now intelligent people will understand this issue in the context of the myriad problems associated with distributional analysis, most notably the fact that we arent doing a lifetime analysis and that we are mixing different types of tax unit arrangements such as singles and married couples. These are merely snapshots. So somebody who is middle-income today (say a single tax filer who is 25) could be high-income in five years (married at age 30).
But putting this issue of lifetime incidence aside and focusing on the mere snapshot for 2009, while Obamas tax plan would cut taxes for more middle-income tax units than McCains when ignoring the health care plans, when one adds in the health care plans of the two campaigns, it becomes less clear. Obamas health care plan is largely administered on the spending side whereas McCains is done through the tax side. And McCains health care tax cut (it is a tax cut for most in 2009) would outweigh in the aggregate for the middle-income tax units the difference in tax cuts between Obama and McCain when we ignored the health care plans. McCains health care tax plan is actually the most progressive part of his tax policies. Its an additional tax cut that would cost $1.3 trillion.
So if you look at the middle-income tax units, as measured by TPC preliminary estimates, and if you count the health care plans of both candidates (counting Obamas direct subsidies as equivalent to tax cuts), the middle-income tax units would actually receive a greater post-fisc income increase in the aggregate under McCain than under Obama.
The problem with this analysis is that McCain grows the national debt by a lot more than Obama. So if you equalized Obama and McCains total fiscal impact, Obama would give more relief to the middle-income tax units as a whole. (In other words, a larger share of Obamas fiscal plan goes to the middle-income tax units than McCains; or for every $1 of fiscal spending or tax cuts, Obamas is more likely to go to the middle-income units than McCains.) The true fiscal impact therefore depends upon your assumption of the incidence of the national debt...and well leave that for another day.
Answer: If you believe Obama and the Democrats will only raise taxes on the rich google this:
House Democrats Contemplate Abolishing 401(k) Tax Breaks
Powerful House Democrats are eyeing proposals to overhaul the nation’s $3 trillion 401(k) system, including the elimination of most of the $80 billion in annual tax breaks that 401(k) investors receive.
It is us in the middle class that will lose this tax break
That is $80 billion in additional taxes on the middle class.
Category: Elections
Will the Presidential Debates Make a Difference? - Peter Fenn ...
19 hours ago ... Will the Presidential Debates Make a Difference? ... A lot of memorable moments, one liners, post-debate analysis of winners-losers, but not ...
Paul Ryan Rejects Need For Breakthrough Campaign Moment
WASHINGTON — Mitt Romney's running mate shot down the need for a breakthrough in the first presidential debate Wednesday, trying to allay Republican concerns that the race is slipping away with five weeks to go and momentum on President Barack Obama's side. Vice presidential nominee ... MoveOn Gov @MittRomney and @PaulRyanVP, make no mistake, @BarackObama will win in November. http://t.co/8LuInEFo #Obamacare · 15 hours ago from MoveOn ...
Economics and Politics by Paul Krugman - The Conscience of a ...
9 hours ago ... First, what does it say about the causes of euro imbalances? ... invoking the 2004 debates as an example of game-changers (Kerry cut dramatically ... which among other things contains an analysis of a case that bears directly on ... The GOP has made it clear that it has a very different vision of what America ...
Yes, Debates Do Make a Difference - White House Dossier
22 hours ago ... Yes, Debates Do Make a Difference. by Keith ... The debates may represent a particularly plump opportunity for Romney, given the .... In the final analysis, the math is simple and the method, mode, and means well understood.
Can some one please critique this I have to send it off today...thanks in advance?
Mahatma Gandhi once stated ,"Live life as if you were to die tomorrow. Learn as if you will live forever." These word have greatly shaped my aptitude for learning, and helping others. During my life, I have engaged in activities such as volunteering in the childcare, and education field. These things have greatly humbled me and giving me a clearer direction for the future. I would like to be apart of the Ag-Discovery Program because it would open doors to new opportunities to grow, learn, and be involved in agricultural activities. It would give me a chance to explore the benefits of attending college, to expand knowledge, and grow as a person.
There are several of things that I would love to gain knowledge about, one in which I am highly intrigued with is Ecological studies. I would like to gain more knowledge about the broad impact we as humans have on the earth. Environmental factors plays an important role in our lives today, and learning about the smallest sector in the environment can make a more prodigious difference. Being apart of the Ag-Discover will help me gain a new perspective and growth on life. I would like to learn about multiple ways in which a person can use plants in order to cure diseases; in what ways can we help cure plants.
My future goals after high school are to attend college and double major in Ecology, and English. These are both passions of mine that I plan on perusing throughout my career. Ecology is something I feel as I can make a difference in by preserving the earth, and its natural resources. Ecologist all over the globe have been making discoveris in society, these people I idol. The people who can witness things pass the earths’ , flowers, trees, and clouds. The people who can look at the whole picture, those who can see how everything in nature flows according well, in order to maintain its beauty. English on the other hand is my niche that I have found a good outlet to express myself. English is an opportunity to reach people, it is life. Without words, and the earth I would not belong, These are the main things that have shaped me to be who I am. A future ecologist, and a present humanist
. After earning Bachelors’ degree in each of those subjects, I would like to further expand my education and earn my masters degree. I would like to teach as an Professor in Ecology or English , and perhaps become a science writer.
I have several of hobbies and interest. I love to read, my favorite book is A Tree Grows in Brooklyn. A narrative written my Betty Smith, a women who I believe has the most interesting aspect on life, writing about themes such as class, poverty, education, perseverance through hardship and more. I also love reading poetry, most importantly poetry written by Emily Dickinson. I garden in my backyard from spring until the winter. love to relax , and witness nature. Sometimes the best thing to do is enjoy nature look beyond what is normal to the eye. I love to explore and determine how new concepts fit into existing theories. I am also interested in behavior analysis, the human mind interest me. I play the acoustic guitar, and flute. With the several tings a person is capable of. In addition, I have remained active debate club, and photography club at my school, I strive to continue being active.
Topics Im supposed to cover?
Why do I want to be apart of it?
What do I want to learn?
What are my future goals?
What are my hobbies and interest?
Ummm...Im sdef not going to pay someone to critique my essay Its not like im some billionairee ugh
Ummm...Im sdef not going to pay someone to critique my essay Its not like im some billionairee ugh
Answer: Is this a college application essay? I have to say, it was impressive during the beginning and toward the middle. There is just a few grammar mistakes that need to be fixed. Also, there is extra words that need to be cut out. Here they are:
You wrote:
My future goals after high school are to attend college and double major in Ecology, and English. These are both passions of mine that I plan on perusing throughout my career.
Edited: Future goals after high school: attend college and double major in Ecology and English.
You wrote:
. . . how everything in nature flows according well
Edited: . . .how everything in nature flows well accordingly.
You wrote:
English on the other hand is my niche that I have found a good outlet to express myself. English is an opportunity to reach people, it is life. Without words, and the earth I would not belong,
Edited:
English, on the other hand, is my niche. English is an opportunity to reach people; it is life. Without words, and the earth, I would not belong.
You wrote:
. . . masters degree.
Edited:
Master's degree.
You wrote:
I have several of hobbies and interest. I love to read, my favorite book is A Tree Grows in Brooklyn. A narrative written my Betty Smith, a women who I believe has the most interesting aspect on life, writing about themes such as class, poverty, education, perseverance through hardship and more.
Edited:
I love to read. My favorite book is A TREE GROWS IN BROOKLYN, a narrative written my Betty Smith--a women who I believe has the most interesting aspect on life, writing about themes such as class, poverty, education, perseverance through hardship and more.
The rest is okay. There was a few comma errors, but I think that was because you were typing fast.
Good luck.
Category: Books & Authors
Brown-Warren post-debate analysis - Le·gal In·sur·rec·tion
Brown won big on Warren's personal problems, which took up the first 15 minutes or more of the debate (Cherokee and representing big companies)(the licensing issue was not raised). Warren supporters on Twitter ... That pretty much summed up the difference. The hometown guy ..... As for that prick David Gregory, what can be said, the man's a lefty, he is part of the DC elitists, trying his best to make sure the power continues to be centralized in DC. Like or Dislike: ...
Majority Of Undecided Voters In Western States Will Be Watching ...
A new study to be released by Project New America on Wednesday, just before the first presidential debate in Denver, shows that a strong majority of undecided voters in western states are waiting to make their decision about which candidate to vote ... Based on everything you've heard about this 47% comment, does this make you more likely to vote for Mitt Romney, less likely to vote for Mitt Romney, or does it make no difference? ..... Based on HuffPost Pollster charts and analysis ...
Yes, Debates Do Make a Difference - White House Dossier
Yes, Debates Do Make a Difference. by Keith Koffler on October 1, 2012, 11:02 am. One of the myths I've been hearing on TV and from other reliable sources of information – yes, I'm being sarcastic – is that presidential debates generally don't ...
Race42012 Electoral Map: Debate Week Edition | Race 4 2012
You can't hear any piece of news about the election from any source without hearing about the debate – and how it may very well be a make-or-break moment in the campaign. All the rhetoric, for once, isn't far off, either. Historically speaking, the ... prior to Labor Day are partially based on a month of polling.) Final analysis also takes into account more subjective measures, such as favorability ratings, job approval, momentum, advertising, and other assorted variables.
Obama, Romney Prepare For Presidential Debates While Biden ...
AFP #VIDEO: Can US presidential debates make a difference to the final outcome? http://t.co/GJ0wFnah · 4 hours ago from ... LINKS ON THIS TOPIC. 1 of 5. Social TV App Peel to Give Deep Analysis of Presidential Debates ...
Can someone please help with these anthropology questions (Multiple Choice)?
Hi, I have an anthropology take home test and I couldnt do it today because I had two basketball games, and had to go see my grandma in the hospital. It 12:30 here, And I still have to active read 50 pages. If you could answer all these I would really appreciate it. I dont think they will be too hard if you know youre anthropolgy.
1)As an ethnologist my first choice for a method of data collection would be:
A) Natural observation where my subjects would be unaware that they were being observed.
B) Controlled observation so that I could scientifically measure my subjects responses to certain stimuli.
C) Participant observation in which I will attempt to participate fully in the behaviors of my subjects, short of risking my own safety.
D) Studying video reports sent back to the states by missionaries.
2)Which branch of anthropology would be interested in the study of how the behavior of a chimpanzee social group might inform us about the behavior of early human ancestors?
A) Cultural Anthropology
B) Archaeology
C) Linguistic Anthropology
D) Physical Anthropology
3)What could have resolved the controversy between Margaret Mead and Derek Freeman regarding their interpretation of sexual development in Samoan society?
A) A debate between Mead and Freeman before Meads death.
B) Better methodological design in both of their studies.
C) A focus on the data rather than an effort to discredit one scientists work.
D) All of the above
E) None of the above
4) Since cultural anthropology relies so heavily on social interaction which of the following is probably the most significant issue which poses difficulties for an ethnographer when then initially begin data collection in their fieldwork?
A) Whether or not the people make the ethnographer part of their kinship system
B) Language Differences
C) How nice the people are
D) Whether or not the ethnographer can learn to eat local food
You are an ethnologist doing fieldwork in a remote tropical are. You are studying a society of people whom you find personally repugnant. They smell bad to you, they scar and mutilate their bodies for decoration, they eat a diet consisting largely of insects, ant they are violent and abusive towards one another and have on occasion threatened you.
5)Which of the following would be an appropriate methodology for studying this culture?
A) Participate in this culture adopting their diet and behaviors.
B) Remove yourself from the village and try to do a natural observation.
C) Participate as fully as possible without compromising your own safety and values.
6) How would you control personal bias in this study (described above in question #5)? How would you analyze this culture and insure the validity of your findings (described above) without letting personal bias and values affect you analysis of the data? How would you insure that other scientists could verify your interpretations with follow up research? (Describe the process you would take to deal with these methodological issues)
7)Clifford Geertz, in his description of Balinese culture, claimed that he could make no progress in his enthnography until a particular incident occurred. Geertz claimed that running from the police along with the local villagers during a police raid provided him with the breakthrough to get his fieldwork going. Why was this event necessary in order for the Balinese to feel that they could work with the Geertzs? How does the Geertzs experience compare with Chagnons? What is different about Balinese culture in comparison with American culture that made this breakthrough necessary?
Thanks to whoever answers and if someone has a steam account, I will get them a game on sale or something.
Answer: I'm an archaeologist, not a cultural/social anthropologist and It has been several years since I've read about this stuff, so the following are my best guesses for the questions. Caveat emptor.
1) A
2) A
3) D
4) B
5) C
6) Have no idea about this one.
7) It has been a while, but if I remember correctly, this question refers to the story Geertz tells about attending a cockfight. He had to run from the police with the villagers in order to gain their trust so that they would act as reliable informants to him. All I remember about Chagnon is that he studied the Yanamamo of South America and his research and methods are considered controversial. I believe he immersed (inserted?) himself into the culture to the point of changing it and producing traits that may not have existed (or at least exaggerated them). At least that was the allegations, from many years ago.
Good luck
Category: Anthropology
Politics news and analysis on The Atlantic
An Umbrella Made of Asteroid? ... How the Internet Will Transform Government .... Romney's performance in debate might make a difference... if the debates ...
The mistakes candidates make in debates - CNN.com
1 day ago ... Presidential candidates Al Gore, left, and George W. Bush debate in ... that there are very few presidential debates that make a huge difference in the ... on everything the candidate does, and the political-analysis-industrial ...
What do you think about progressive James Hamshers analysis of Obamacare?
http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2010/03/19/fact-sheet-the-truth-about-the-health-care-bill/
The Firedoglake health care team has been covering the debate in congress since it began last year. The health care bill will come up for a vote in the House on Sunday, and as Nancy Pelosi works to wrangle votes, we’ve been running a detailed whip count on where every member of Congress stands, updated throughout the day.
We’ve also taken a detailed look at the bill, and have come up with 18 often stated myths about this health care reform bill.
Real health care reform is the thing we’ve fought for from the start. It is desperately needed. But this bill falls short on many levels, and hurts many people more than it helps.
A middle class family of four making $66,370 will be forced to pay $5,243 per year for insurance. After basic necessities, this leaves them with $8,307 in discretionary income — out of which they would have to cover clothing, credit card and other debt, child care and education costs, in addition to $5,882 in annual out-of-pocket medical expenses for which families will be responsible. Many families who are already struggling to get by would be better off saving the $5,243 in insurance costs and paying their medical expenses directly, rather than being forced to by coverage they can’t afford the co-pays on.
In addition, there is already a booming movement across the country to challenge the mandate. Thirty-three states already have bills moving through their houses, and the Idaho governor was the first to sign it into law yesterday. In Virginia it passed through both a Democratic House and Senate, and the governor will sign it soon. It will be on the ballot in Arizona in 2010, and is headed in that direction for many more. Republican senators like Dick Lugar are already asking their state attorney generals to challenge it. There are two GOP think tanks actively helping states in their efforts, and there is a booming messaging infrastructure that covers it beat-by-beat.
Whether Steny Hoyer believes the legality of the bill will prevail in court or not is moot, it could easily become the “gay marriage” of 2010, with one key difference: there will be no one on the other side passionately opposing it. The GOP is preparing to use it as a massive turn-out vehicle, and it not only threatens representatives in states like Florida, Colorado and Ohio where these challenges will likely be on the ballot — it threatens gubernatorial and down-ticket races as well. Artur Davis, running for governor of Alabama, is already being put on the spot about it.
While details are limited, there is apparently a “Plan B” alternative that the White House was considering, which would evidently expand existing programs — Medicaid and SCHIP. It would cover half the people at a quarter of the price, but it would not force an unbearable financial burden to those who are already struggling to get by. Because it creates no new infrastructure for the purpose of funneling money to private insurance companies, there is no need for Bart Stupak’s or Ben Nelson’s language dealing with abortion — which satisfies the concerns of pro-life members of Congress, as well as women who are looking at the biggest blow to women’s reproductive rights in 35 years with the passage of this bill. Both programs are already covered under existing law, the Hyde amendment.
But perhaps most profoundly, the bill does not mandate that people pay 8% of their annual income to private insurance companies or face a penalty of up to 2% — which the IRS would collect. As Marcy Wheeler noted in an important post entitled “Health Care on the Road to NeoFeudalism,” we stand on the precipice of doing something truly radical in our government, by demanding that Americans pay almost as much money to private insurance companies as they do in federal taxes:
When this passes, it will become clear that Congress is no longer the sovereign of this nation. Rather, the corporations dictating the laws will be.
I understand the temptation to offer 30 million people health care. What I don’t understand is the nonchalance with which we’re about to fundamentally shift the relationships of governance in doing so.
(there is more on the link its a pretty long article)
What do you think?
Answer: Jane H. is an extremely bright woman, but she lost credibility when she teamed up with Grover Norquist to wreak chaos for the Democrats. Your analysis isn't exactly plausible, since 85% of the Americans will not be affected at all with the new legislation.
Category: Politics
Why debates don't always make a difference - CNN.com
3 days ago ... So a good debate performance or a poor one can make a difference, but ... Get the latest opinion and analysis from CNN's columnists and ...
The Atlantic — News and analysis on politics, business, culture ...
An Umbrella Made of Asteroid? ... How the Internet Will Transform Government .... Romney's performance in debate might make a difference... if the debates ...
Senators, Schuette debate need for Blues asset analysis | Crain's ...
Individuals and small-business customers could save about $200 million a year in premiums because the subsidies Blue Cross are required to collect to fund other lines of coverage will end. ... "I want to get (the asset evaluation and enabling legislation) done right to make sure the people of Michigan, seniors and the most vulnerable are not stiffed" by inadequate funding for the proposed nonprofit foundation that would ... No, but it is a distinction without a difference.
Analysis: Will The Debates Make a Difference? - ABC News http://t.co/MubJu5LE From: ashishpanchal14 - Source: jalaram
ABC News: Analysis: Will The Debates Make a Difference? - http://t.co/tPpO01hx From: Everett2007 - Source: Facebook
Analysis: Will The Debates Make a Difference? - ABC News http://t.co/OSSbP8aV From: __Politics - Source: twitterfeed
Analysis: Will The Debates Make a Difference?: Last week Mitt Romney opened an Ohio bus tour on the same day tha... http://t.co/bmecQxOe From: Ink_Garage - Source: twitterfeed
Analysis: Will The Debates Make a Difference? http://t.co/1EMXDmh9 From: RosemaryJacobs3 - Source: twitterfeed
Analysis: Will The Debates Make a Difference? http://t.co/OO0621lg From: KyleHutchins28 - Source: twitterfeed
Analysis: Will The Debates Make a Difference? http://t.co/EzjwkFE8 From: JackClayton617 - Source: twitterfeed
Analysis: Will The Debates Make a Difference? http://t.co/wvVnhwCt From: markarthn - Source: dlvr.it
Analysis: Will The Debates Make a Difference? http://t.co/WXAyZQJV #GOP2012 From: eye_on_romney - Source: twitterfeed
ABC News Analysis: Will The Debates Make a Difference? ABC News ANAYSIS: Last week Mitt… http://t.co/00906Qoh From: pixeldome - Source: Google
Analysis: Will The Debates Make a Difference? - ABC News http://t.co/GdsDWPt3 From: electionTF - Source: twitterfeed
Analysis: Will The Debates Make a Difference? - ABC News http://t.co/ZzAMax4S From: MinnesotaSiren - Source: Google
#UCWRadio Analysis: Will The Debates Make a Difference? http://t.co/6esgYf7Z #news From: UCWNews - Source: dlvr.it
Analysis: Will The Debates Make a Difference? http://t.co/OoFtpWar #Politics #news #hot #business From: AlenKarabegovic - Source: dlvr.it
Analysis: Will The Debates Make a Difference? http://t.co/XNAo5c1D From: GraceStopShop - Source: dlvr.it