North Texas trucker could soon be freed from Mexican jail

Texas Trucker Could Be Freed From Mexican... : Photo Gallery

Texas trucker's arrest re-enacted in Mexico - Worldnews. Texas trucker's arrest re-enacted in Mexico - Worldnews. Free Jabin Bogan an innocent	Texas trucker's arrest re-enacted in Juárez - El Paso Times Texas trucker's arrest re-enacted in Juárez - El Paso Times Texas trucker's arrest	North Texas trucker could soon be freed from Mexican jail ... North Texas trucker could soon be freed from Mexican jail ... in Mexico will be released	U.S. Attorney: $100 million Customs fraud exposed - Worldnews. U.S. Attorney: $100 million Customs fraud exposed - Worldnews. Customs Told Trucker to Drive
DOT Outlines Cross-Border Trucking Provisions — Texas-Mexico ... DOT Outlines Cross-Border Trucking Provisions — Texas-Mexico ... Proposed DOT Trucker	Boss: Driver took wrong turn into Juárez with load of ammo - ALIPAC Boss: Driver took wrong turn into Juárez with load of ammo - ALIPAC Customs told trucker to drive	Narco Wars – Mexico Trucker Online Narco Wars – Mexico Trucker Online A Texas trucker caught hauling	Mexican truck is first in US under NAFTA - Business - World ... Mexican truck is first in US under NAFTA - Business - World ... Only 10 other Mexican trucking
U.S.-Mexico Trucker Dispute Takes a Step Forward - NYTimes. U.S.-Mexico Trucker Dispute Takes a Step Forward - NYTimes. U.S.-Mexico Trucker Dispute	Weapons trafficking « Mexico Institute Weapons trafficking « Mexico Institute The lawyer for a Texas trucker	Trucking Program Raises Border Policy Questions — Texas-Mexico ... Trucking Program Raises Border Policy Questions — Texas-Mexico ... Some Texas Republicans are	El Paso City Council urges Mexico to free Texas trucker - El Paso ... El Paso City Council urges Mexico to free Texas trucker - El Paso ... U.S. truck driver detained
Government Sues Trucking Company for Taking Keys Away From ... Government Sues Trucking Company for Taking Keys Away From ... In this May 6, 2011 file photo	Richard's Printery in Louisville, Kentucky Adds U-Haul Rentals ... Richard's Printery in Louisville, Kentucky Adds U-Haul Rentals ... Trucker Faces Battle Against	Mexican customs agent says Texas trucker nabbed at border with ... Mexican customs agent says Texas trucker nabbed at border with ... In this webinar you will learn	Texas trucker's arrest re-enacted in Mexico - Worldnews. Texas trucker's arrest re-enacted in Mexico - Worldnews. Rob is trucking again. This time he's Trucking on down to laredo Texas come
Texas trucker could be freed from Mexican prison Texas trucker could be freed from Mexican prison EL PASO, Texas (AP) — A Dallas truck driver who says he made a wrong turn into Mexico with a trailer full of ammunition may soon be released from a Mexican prison after paying a fine. A federal judge overseeing the case of Jabin Bogan told The El Paso ...	North Texas trucker could soon be freed from Mexican jail North Texas trucker could soon be freed from Mexican jail A Mexican newspaper says a North Texas truck driver imprisoned in Mexico will be released — but there's a condition. The El Norte newspaper said Jabin Bogan of Irving will be set free if he pays a $1,500 fine. Bogan was accused of illegally entering ...	Montel Williams Gives His Take On James Bond's ''Skyfall.'' Montel Williams Gives His Take On James Bond's ''Skyfall.'' EL PASO, Texas (AP) -- A Dallas truck driver who says he made a wrong turn into Mexico with a trailer full of ammunition may soon be released from a Mexican prison. A federal judge overseeing the case of Jabin Bogan tells the El Paso Times that the ...	Link Discovered Between Driver Obesity and Crash Risk Link Discovered Between Driver Obesity and Crash Risk A study has confirmed what many in trucking already believed -- that there's a direct connection between a truck driver's crash risk and his or her body mass index. Obese truckers, during their first two years on the road, are 43% to 55% more likely to ...
Landowners Say US Government Has Shortchanged Them On Seized Border ... Landowners Say US Government Has Shortchanged Them On Seized Border ... Most are in Texas, because that state has more private property along the border than do New Mexico, Arizona or California, where much of the border land is already in federal hands. An Associated ... But those examples did nothing to help people such ...	Republic Services Invests $25 million in CNG Trucks Republic Services Invests $25 million in CNG Trucks 10/11/2012 - Back to the Future: The Current and Coming Driver Shortage LAS VEGAS - At least one industry analyst has predicted the driver shortage could reach 500,000 by sometime net year. The American Trucking Associations recently reported that ...	August Surface Trade with Canada and Mexico Rose 2.6% August Surface Trade with Canada and Mexico Rose 2.6% Trade using surface transportation between the United States and its North American Free Trade Agreement partners, Canada and Mexico, was 2.6% higher in August 2012 than in August 2011. ... 10/10/2012 - Economic Panel Sees Mixed Forecast for Trucking ...	KEYC - Mankato News, Weather, Sports -Vroom! Fastest US road, 85 mph ... KEYC - Mankato News, Weather, Sports -Vroom! Fastest US road, 85 mph ... Fastest US road, 85 mph, opens in Texas. Member Center: ... The architects of a proposed class-action settlement of claims spawned by the 2010 oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico are confident it won't be derailed by thousands of businesses and individuals ...
Texas trooper in chopper shoots, kills 2 suspected illegal immigrants Texas trooper in chopper shoots, kills 2 suspected illegal immigrants HOUSTON -- Two people were killed in Texas's Rio Grande Valley after a state trooper flying in a highway patrol helicopter opened fire on a fleeing pickup authorities thought was smuggling drugs, officials said. No drugs were ... Troopers suspected the ...	WWII veteran Adolfo Carrilo Villanueva to be honored at upcoming Veterans Day ... WWII veteran Adolfo Carrilo Villanueva to be honored at upcoming Veterans Day ... He started school at age eight in a segregated classroom school with about 20 Mexican American children who lived in the same area. By age 15, Villanueva ... Villanueva, who before the war had never left Texas, was then sent to Italy with the 36th ...	The global Mexican The global Mexican WHEN Jorge Castañeda (later Mexico's foreign minister) was a boy, a typical family holiday was to drive to Texas. ... The customs officer would confiscate the TV and miss the rest. Mexico has transformed itself. A generation ago it defended its borders ...	Election Results 2012: Voting Begins in Iowa Election Results 2012: Voting Begins in Iowa In the past, the stickers have been free swag handed out by businesses to lure people into their shops for free stuff – everything from free sopapillas from On the Border to "INDIVISIBLE” wristbands from Starbucks to a chance to win a round-trip base ...
Staci L. Kroon has been named president, Automotive, North America Division at ... Staci L. Kroon has been named president, Automotive, North America Division at ... 10/29/2012 - Stuart Goldberg Named Trucker Buddy of the Month Averitt Express driver Stuart Goldberg, of Arlington, Texas, has been named the August Trucker Buddy of the Month by Jocelyn Murphy-Stout, social studies chair for Egg Harbor City Community ...	Stuart Goldberg Named Trucker Buddy of the Month Stuart Goldberg Named Trucker Buddy of the Month According to Murphy-Stout, Trucker Buddy Goldberg helps the students learn about a different area in the United States, one that has different climate, the Texas State Fair and different Texas sports teams. There is a huge map of ..... 10/5/2012 - New ...	American farmers flourish in Mexico American farmers flourish in Mexico “American farmers have been going to Mexico for as long as I can remember,” said Tom Nassif, president and chief executive officer of Western Growers, a crop industry trade association. “It seems to be cyclical,” Nassif said. “They go over there for a ...	YRC Worldwide Announces 2012 Destination Green Environmental Excellence ... YRC Worldwide Announces 2012 Destination Green Environmental Excellence ... 10/11/2012 - Back to the Future: The Current and Coming Driver Shortage LAS VEGAS - At least one industry analyst has predicted the driver shortage could reach 500,000 by sometime net year. The American Trucking Associations recently reported that ...

Texas Trucker Could Be Freed From Mexican... : Videos

Truckin In TeXas Truckin In TeXas TeXas Trucking, there is a huge moral to this story, hint, who is working for chrome and who is working for food, it goes much deeper than that. Rated: 4.7768593     Duration: 354 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: www.youtube.com on Sat, 01 Sep 2007 16:45:18 PDT	Laredo, TX Laredo, TX Driving from I-35 to where I am to deliver. The traffic wasn't as bad as I was expecting. Its normally like what you will see when I make my ... Rated: 4.2727275     Duration: 243 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: www.youtube.com on Mon, 06 Oct 2008 13:55:30 PDT	The Dangers of the North American Union by Jerome Corsi -- NAU SPP NWO NAFTA The Dangers of the North American Union by Jerome Corsi -- NAU SPP NWO NAFTA open to drug smuggling and terrorists. Mexico could suffer a catastrophic brain-and-labor-drain as all Mexican citizens by right could move to the ... Rated: 4.7090397     Duration: 1664 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: www.youtube.com on Fri, 05 Jan 2007 16:59:28 PST	Convoy Movie song (comments open again) Convoy Movie song (comments open again) 'bout five mile or so. Yeah, them hogs is gettin' in-tense up here. New Mexico, on I-four-oh Like a Texas lizard on glass One thousand ... Rated: 4.908679     Duration: 240 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: www.youtube.com on Sun, 02 Nov 2008 17:44:12 PST
North American Union Update North American Union Update States, Canada, and Mexico. Marrs shared how the US government is working secretly through various legislative loopholes to pave the way for ... Rated: 5     Duration: 9217 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: www.youtube.com on Mon, 05 Nov 2012 15:39:34 PST	Freight Broker Training - Take Our Challenge! Freight Broker Training - Take Our Challenge! for less and don't miss out on this incredible limited time offer ... ideal broker training ... Freight Broker Training Online Education ... Rated: 2.3333333     Duration: 147 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: www.youtube.com on Wed, 24 Nov 2010 19:38:21 PST	Truck Accident Attorneys - When Loads or Cargo are Not Secure, Peope Get Hurt or Die Truck Accident Attorneys - When Loads or Cargo are Not Secure, Peope Get Hurt or Die injured in a trucking accident caused by an unsecured load or improperly loaded trailor, do not hesitate to contact us toll free at 800-773-6770 ... Rated: 3     Duration: 118 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: www.youtube.com on Mon, 31 Aug 2009 07:19:15 PDT	Mike Johnson Truckin * "Hang On Snoopy" Mike Johnson Truckin * "Hang On Snoopy" But once he reaches El Paso, lookout Juarez, Mexico! Mike Johnson was not a 'truck stop' trucker. He always found something to do ... Rated: 3.1666667     Duration: 183 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: www.youtube.com on Fri, 04 Apr 2008 14:51:00 PDT
NAFTA Superhighway And The Planet X Connection? NAFTA Superhighway And The Planet X Connection? primarily on the port personnel in Mexico. The vast majority of cargo will pass through the border unimpeded and will not be inspected. We will be ... Rated: 5     Duration: 422 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: www.youtube.com on Tue, 22 Feb 2011 21:08:18 PST	Drug Cartel Torture, Murder To Warn Social Media Users Drug Cartel Torture, Murder To Warn Social Media Users theyoungturks ... members and those that does drug cartel in mexico i handed mangled bodies from the dept industrial abridge in mexico and they ... Rated: 4.8838711     Duration: 231 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: www.youtube.com on Thu, 15 Sep 2011 18:59:35 PDT	HOW TO PERFORM A SERVICE BRAKE TEST FOR AIR BRAKE ENDORSEMENT FOR CDL HOW TO PERFORM A SERVICE BRAKE TEST FOR AIR BRAKE ENDORSEMENT FOR CDL mjjr bridgewater salt lake city Cars Marietta Jim truck driver trucker pilot flying stop south Mexico west virginia texas kentucky new jersey york ... Rated: 3.2857144     Duration: 218 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: www.youtube.com on Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:10:54 PST	Little Red Wagon - Doye ODell Little Red Wagon - Doye ODell name. Our man Doye O'Dell went down to the Mexican border to work on XCPM, stayed there a year and then joined Doc Snyder's Texas Cowboys ... Rated: 5     Duration: 147 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: www.youtube.com on Thu, 28 Oct 2010 14:34:53 PDT
Under Construction Part 1 of 3 Under Construction Part 1 of 3 the issue of the NAFTA Super Highway. This highway will bring change to every citizen in the United States, Mexico and Canada. It is seperated ... Rated: 5     Duration: 323 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: www.youtube.com on Fri, 25 May 2007 12:18:29 PDT	Jerry Jeff Walker - Wheel (1973) (w/Lyrics) [1080p HD] ~MetalGuruMessiah #107~ Jerry Jeff Walker - Wheel (1973) (w/Lyrics) [1080p HD] ~MetalGuruMessiah #107~ to this day. A bit of Texas tradition is captured in "Sangria Wine," a recollection of nights passed in the company of friends, Mexican ... Rated: 5     Duration: 392 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: www.youtube.com on Sat, 05 May 2012 18:49:18 PDT	Pyaar Kii Ye Ek Kahaani - 11th April 2011 Part 4/4 - (148 Episode) Pyaar Kii Ye Ek Kahaani - 11th April 2011 Part 4/4 - (148 Episode) ... Juhi 110998 PKYEK ever ... Sukirti Khandpal Pia Dobriyal Rajkumari Maithali Vivian Dsena Abhay Raichand/ Abhayendra Singh Naved Aslam Chand ... Rated: 4     Duration: 296 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: www.youtube.com on Mon, 11 Jul 2011 07:17:44 PDT	Am I Free to Go? Am I Free to Go? Please SHARE, RATE, FAVORITE, and SUBSCRIBE. Thank you!. Video that a truck driver took at a suspicionless checkpoint in TX about an hour from the ... Rated: 4.775     Duration: 266 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: www.youtube.com on Sat, 20 Oct 2012 18:24:10 PDT
"Do you think your guy friends wanna hook up with you?" "Do you think your guy friends wanna hook up with you?" Genius, Demonstrated by Ryan Seacrest. He gets each caller to show what they project onto others. "On Air with Ryan Seacrest" -- Ryan ... Rated: 2.004329     Duration: 654 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: www.youtube.com on Tue, 30 Oct 2012 21:34:21 PDT	̣ ̣ USA and Canada Free Wesleyan Church Free Will Baptist Church of the Pentecostal Faith Free Will Baptists Free Will Baptists Randall Northern Free ... Rated: 2.955801     Duration: 319 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: www.youtube.com on Fri, 22 Apr 2011 15:17:43 PDT	Chinese troops amassing near US border? NWO 1 of 3 (Dangerous) Shocking Chinese troops amassing near US border? NWO 1 of 3 (Dangerous) Shocking (("DOWNLOAD THIS VIDEO FREE or SEND LINK TO EVERYBODY YOU CAN")) ... Antichrist NWO ... Chinese troops amassing near US border? NWO ... Rated: 3.1463416     Duration: 599 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: www.youtube.com on Wed, 31 Mar 2010 08:25:18 PDT	General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) is a multilateral agreement regulating international trade. According to its preamble, its ... Rated: 3.8     Duration: 5802 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: www.youtube.com on Tue, 03 Jul 2012 00:40:36 PDT
Thomson cigars Thomson cigars fun, writes Patterson Hood in the liner notes for The Big To-Do, the new album from his band the Drive-By Truckers. Well, yes and no. The darkness ... Rated: -1     Duration: 14 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: www.youtube.com on Tue, 31 Jul 2012 09:49:22 PDT	Mike Johnson Song: "Take Time Out" Mike Johnson Song: "Take Time Out" watching those ads. It was first released later that year on my cassette album "Did You Hug Your Mother Today?" It was again released in ... Rated: 5     Duration: 163 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: www.youtube.com on Wed, 21 May 2008 00:49:49 PDT	A Incrível Jornada Humana - Ep. 5: As Américas (BBC-2009) [HD] A Incrível Jornada Humana - Ep. 5: As Américas (BBC-2009) [HD] couldn't have arrived through the ice-free corridor, then maybe they did come across the Pacific. And if they did, that might eXplain one of ... Rated: 5     Duration: 3506 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: www.youtube.com on Tue, 21 Aug 2012 03:43:59 PDT	Bat Caves of Texas - Texas Parks and Wildlife [Official] Bat Caves of Texas - Texas Parks and Wildlife [Official] A tour of some of the best viewing spots in Texas for Mexican free-tailed bats. Meet a bat up close and get an inside view of how bats live. Rated: 5     Duration: 497 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: www.youtube.com on Fri, 19 Jun 2009 10:15:06 PDT

Texas Trucker Could Be Freed From Mexican... : Latest News, Information, Answers and Websites

Amid lawsuits, Mexican pilot program plods on - OverdriveOnline.com

Get a Free Subscription to Overdrive Magazine! ... As lawsuits continue against the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration's cross-border trucking pilot program with Mexico, the agency is continuing the program as-intended, granting two more carriers operating authority in the U.S. since mid-October, upping ... On Oct. 22, the court rejected OOIDA's request to schedule oral arguments so both cases would be heard at the same time and before the same judges.

Texas Insider » US, Mexico Sign Cross-border Trucking Agreement ...

MEXICO CITY (AP) – U.S. and Mexican officials signed an agreement Wednesday allowing each country's trucks to traverse the other's highways, implementing a key provision of the 1994 North American Free Trade Agreement after ... “By opening the door to long-haul trucking between the United States and Mexico, America's third largest trading partner, we will create jobs and opportunity for our people and support economic development in both nations,” he said.

DPS Director Steve McCraw ” Not Apologetic” - Mexico Trucker Online

There are 532 Parks and Wildlife officers in the state of Texas, fully commissioned peace officers with the same statutory authority as DPS troopers. According to DPS policy, lethal force is can be used when the officer or ...

Trucker News - Topix

North Texas trucker could soon be freed from Mexican jail. Jabin Bogan, 27, was arrested by Mexican authorities as he tried to do a U-turn at the border outside ...

Who would you vote for between Fred Thompson and John Edwards?

Answer: Fred Thompson. But I would rather vote for Ron Paul. Fred Thompson is not a real conservative. Conservatives who look to Thompson for salvation need to pause and consider his record—a record that includes these votes: Americans For Better Immigration rated his voting record with a "C" grade. http://www.betterimmigration.com/candidates/2006/prez08_gop1.html Tancredo, Ron Paul, and Hunter all have much more conservative voting records on immigration. http://www.betterimmigration.com/candidates/2006/prez08_gop2.html As a confirmed member of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) Thompson would support the North American Union. http://www.eagleforum.org/column/2005/july05/05-07-13.html http://youtube.com/watch?v=kXevDajb2lo The CFR wants to allow Mexican trucks "unlimited access" to the United States, including the hauling of local loads between U.S. cities. The CFR calls for creating a "North American preference" so that employers can recruit low-paid workers from anywhere in North America. No longer will illegal aliens have to be smuggled across the border; employers can openly recruit foreigners willing to work for a fraction of U.S. wages. The CFR plan calls for massive U.S. foreign aid to the other countries. The burden on the U.S. taxpayers will include so-called "multilateral development" from the World Bank and the Inter-American Development Bank, "long-term loans in pesos," and a North American Investment Fund to send U.S. private capital to Mexico. As a proponent of free trade Thompson would support the the NAFTA Superhighway. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MBmFrYWPoG8 http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul349.html http://www.ontheissues.org/senate/Fred_Thompson.htm#Free_Trade "Indeed, the image of the highway, with its Chinese goods whizzing across the border borne by Mexican truckers on a privatized, foreign-operated road, is almost mundane in its plausibility. "Construction of the NAFTA highway from Laredo, Texas to Canada is now underway," read a letter in the February 13 San Gabriel Valley Tribune. "Spain will own most of the toll roads that connect to the superhighway. Mexico will own and operate the Kansas City Smart Port. And NAFTA tribunal, not the U.S. Supreme Court, will have the final word in trade disputes." He also voted: ♦ FOR restricting the rights of grassroots organizations to communicate with the public. See ACU’s vote 3, 1998. ♦ AGAINST an accelerated elimination of the “marriage penalty.” See ACU’s vote 10, 2001. ♦ AGAINST restraints on federal spending, specifically the Phil Gramm (R-TX) amendment to limit non-defense discretionary spending to the fiscal 1997 levels requested by President Clinton. See ACU’s vote 6, 1997. ♦ FOR the Legal Services Corporation, the perennial liberal boondoggle that provides political activism disguised as “legal services” to Democratic constituencies. See ACU’s vote 16, 1995, and vote 17, 1999. ♦ FOR corporate welfare, specifically the Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC). See ACU’s vote 23. 1999. ♦ AGAINST worker and shareholder rights, specifically the Hatch (R-UT) amendment to require unions and corporations to obtain permission from dues-paying members or shareholders before spending money on political activities. See ACU’s votes 4 and 5, 2001. ♦ FOR restricting the First Amendment (free speech) rights of independent groups. See ACU’s vote 23, 1997. ♦ FOR President Clinton’s nomination of Dr. David Satcher as U.S. Surgeon General. Among other things, Satcher opposed a full ban on partial-birth abortion. See ACU’s vote 1, 1998. ♦ FOR handouts to politicians, specifically taxpayer funding of presidential campaigns. See ACU’s vote 6, 1995. ♦ FOR handouts to politicians, specifically congressional perks such as postage and broadcast time funded by taxpayers. See ACU’s vote 13, 1996. ♦ AGAINST property rights and FOR unlimited presidential power, specifically by allowing President Clinton to implement the American Heritage Rivers Initiative, which he established by executive order, without congressional approval. See ACU’s vote 20, 1997. ♦ FOR affirmative action in federal contracts. See ACU’s vote 9, 1995. ♦ FOR an increase in the minimum wage, which, of course, increases unemployment among the young and poor. See ACU’s vote 16, 1996. ♦ FOR open-ended military commitments, specifically in regard to U.S. troops in Kosovo. See ACU’s vote 8, 2000. ♦ FOR the trial lawyers lobby, and specifically against a bill that would put common-sense limitations on the medical malpractice suits that increase health costs for all of us. (Of course! He’s been a trial lawyer himself for some three decades.) See ACU’s vote 18, 2002. ♦ FOR allowing the IRS to require political and policy organizations to disclose their membership—a vote against the constitutional rights of free association and privacy. (The Clinton Administration used such IRS intimidation against conservative groups that opposed them.) See ACU’s vote 11, 2000. ♦ AGAINST impeachment proceedings against President Clinton, specifically the reappointment and reauthorization of managers (drawn from the Republican membership of the House Judiciary Committee) to conduct the impeachment trial in the Senate. See ACU’s vote 1, 1999. There you have it. The actor who talks like a tough conservative has, in his real political life, voted in all these ways to increase the power of the federal government, limit the rights of taxpayers and individual citizens, and shut grassroots activists out of the political process. Ronald Reagan he is NOT! http://www.conservativesbetrayed.com/gw3/articles-latestnews/articles.php?CMSArticleID=1827&CMSCategoryID=19
Category: Elections

Mexican judge: Trucker can go free after paying fine - El Paso Times

6 hours ago ... JUAREZ -- A U.S. truck driver who entered Juárez with a truckload of ammunition in ... Mexican judge: Trucker can go free after paying fine ... El Paso City Council urges Mexico to free Texas trucker · El Paso City Council rep.

Fred Thompson? What has he ever done that qualifies him to run the country?

Many people like him, but he hasnt even participated in one debate, and I wonder if the party will make the same mistake they made with Bush and follow the media pundits lead? He voted 11 out of 13 times for gun-control. His voting record BLOWS HARD. He was a lobbyist.--I dont see that being a good thing. He is pro-war George Bush style ....I also see that as negative. He was also a mole for Nixon. So what the heck are you morons drooling over this loser for?
Answer: Fred Thompson is not a real conservative. Conservatives who look to Thompson for salvation need to pause and consider his record—a record that includes these votes: Americans For Better Immigration rated his voting record with a "C" grade. http://www.betterimmigration.com/candidates/2006/prez08_gop1.html Tancredo, Ron Paul, and Hunter all have much more conservative voting records on immigration. http://www.betterimmigration.com/candidates/2006/prez08_gop2.html http://www.betterimmigration.com/candidates/2006/prez08_gop3.html As a confirmed member of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) Thompson would support the North American Union. http://www.eagleforum.org/column/2005/july05/05-07-13.html http://youtube.com/watch?v=kXevDajb2lo The CFR wants to allow Mexican trucks "unlimited access" to the United States, including the hauling of local loads between U.S. cities. The CFR calls for creating a "North American preference" so that employers can recruit low-paid workers from anywhere in North America. No longer will illegal aliens have to be smuggled across the border; employers can openly recruit foreigners willing to work for a fraction of U.S. wages. The CFR plan calls for massive U.S. foreign aid to the other countries. The burden on the U.S. taxpayers will include so-called "multilateral development" from the World Bank and the Inter-American Development Bank, "long-term loans in pesos," and a North American Investment Fund to send U.S. private capital to Mexico. As a proponent of free trade Thompson would support the the NAFTA Superhighway. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MBmFrYWPoG8 http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul349.html http://www.ontheissues.org/senate/Fred_Thompson.htm#Free_Trade "Indeed, the image of the highway, with its Chinese goods whizzing across the border borne by Mexican truckers on a privatized, foreign-operated road, is almost mundane in its plausibility. "Construction of the NAFTA highway from Laredo, Texas to Canada is now underway," read a letter in the February 13 San Gabriel Valley Tribune. "Spain will own most of the toll roads that connect to the superhighway. Mexico will own and operate the Kansas City Smart Port. And NAFTA tribunal, not the U.S. Supreme Court, will have the final word in trade disputes." He also voted: ♦ FOR restricting the rights of grassroots organizations to communicate with the public. See ACU’s vote 3, 1998. ♦ AGAINST an accelerated elimination of the “marriage penalty.” See ACU’s vote 10, 2001. ♦ AGAINST restraints on federal spending, specifically the Phil Gramm (R-TX) amendment to limit non-defense discretionary spending to the fiscal 1997 levels requested by President Clinton. See ACU’s vote 6, 1997. ♦ FOR the Legal Services Corporation, the perennial liberal boondoggle that provides political activism disguised as “legal services” to Democratic constituencies. See ACU’s vote 16, 1995, and vote 17, 1999. ♦ FOR corporate welfare, specifically the Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC). See ACU’s vote 23. 1999. ♦ AGAINST worker and shareholder rights, specifically the Hatch (R-UT) amendment to require unions and corporations to obtain permission from dues-paying members or shareholders before spending money on political activities. See ACU’s votes 4 and 5, 2001. ♦ FOR restricting the First Amendment (free speech) rights of independent groups. See ACU’s vote 23, 1997. ♦ FOR President Clinton’s nomination of Dr. David Satcher as U.S. Surgeon General. Among other things, Satcher opposed a full ban on partial-birth abortion. See ACU’s vote 1, 1998. ♦ FOR handouts to politicians, specifically taxpayer funding of presidential campaigns. See ACU’s vote 6, 1995. ♦ FOR handouts to politicians, specifically congressional perks such as postage and broadcast time funded by taxpayers. See ACU’s vote 13, 1996. ♦ AGAINST property rights and FOR unlimited presidential power, specifically by allowing President Clinton to implement the American Heritage Rivers Initiative, which he established by executive order, without congressional approval. See ACU’s vote 20, 1997. ♦ FOR affirmative action in federal contracts. See ACU’s vote 9, 1995. ♦ FOR an increase in the minimum wage, which, of course, increases unemployment among the young and poor. See ACU’s vote 16, 1996. ♦ FOR open-ended military commitments, specifically in regard to U.S. troops in Kosovo. See ACU’s vote 8, 2000. ♦ FOR the trial lawyers lobby, and specifically against a bill that would put common-sense limitations on the medical malpractice suits that increase health costs for all of us. (Of course! He’s been a trial lawyer himself for some three decades.) See ACU’s vote 18, 2002. ♦ FOR allowing the IRS to require political and policy organizations to disclose their membership—a vote against the constitutional rights of free association and privacy. (The Clinton Administration used such IRS intimidation against conservative groups that opposed them.) See ACU’s vote 11, 2000. ♦ AGAINST impeachment proceedings against President Clinton, specifically the reappointment and reauthorization of managers (drawn from the Republican membership of the House Judiciary Committee) to conduct the impeachment trial in the Senate. See ACU’s vote 1, 1999. There you have it. The actor who talks like a tough conservative has, in his real political life, voted in all these ways to increase the power of the federal government, limit the rights of taxpayers and individual citizens, and shut grassroots activists out of the political process. Ronald Reagan he is NOT! http://www.conservativesbetrayed.com/gw3/articles-latestnews/articles.php?CMSArticleID=1827&CMSCategoryID=19 I will be voting for Ron Paul.
Category: Elections

Do you respect Fred Thompson more or less for weaseling out of the debate last week?

Answer: Fred Thompson is not a real conservative. Conservatives who look to Thompson for salvation need to pause and consider his record—a record that includes these votes: Americans For Better Immigration rated his voting record with a "C" grade. http://www.betterimmigration.com/candidates/2006/prez08_gop1.html Tancredo, Ron Paul, and Hunter all have much more conservative voting records on immigration. http://www.betterimmigration.com/candidates/2006/prez08_gop2.html http://www.betterimmigration.com/candidates/2006/prez08_gop3.html As a confirmed member of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) Thompson would support the North American Union. http://www.eagleforum.org/column/2005/july05/05-07-13.html http://youtube.com/watch?v=kXevDajb2lo The CFR wants to allow Mexican trucks "unlimited access" to the United States, including the hauling of local loads between U.S. cities. The CFR calls for creating a "North American preference" so that employers can recruit low-paid workers from anywhere in North America. No longer will illegal aliens have to be smuggled across the border; employers can openly recruit foreigners willing to work for a fraction of U.S. wages. The CFR plan calls for massive U.S. foreign aid to the other countries. The burden on the U.S. taxpayers will include so-called "multilateral development" from the World Bank and the Inter-American Development Bank, "long-term loans in pesos," and a North American Investment Fund to send U.S. private capital to Mexico. As a proponent of free trade Thompson would support the the NAFTA Superhighway. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MBmFrYWPoG8 http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul349.html http://www.ontheissues.org/senate/Fred_Thompson.htm#Free_Trade "Indeed, the image of the highway, with its Chinese goods whizzing across the border borne by Mexican truckers on a privatized, foreign-operated road, is almost mundane in its plausibility. "Construction of the NAFTA highway from Laredo, Texas to Canada is now underway," read a letter in the February 13 San Gabriel Valley Tribune. "Spain will own most of the toll roads that connect to the superhighway. Mexico will own and operate the Kansas City Smart Port. And NAFTA tribunal, not the U.S. Supreme Court, will have the final word in trade disputes." He also voted: ♦ FOR restricting the rights of grassroots organizations to communicate with the public. See ACU’s vote 3, 1998. ♦ AGAINST an accelerated elimination of the “marriage penalty.” See ACU’s vote 10, 2001. ♦ AGAINST restraints on federal spending, specifically the Phil Gramm (R-TX) amendment to limit non-defense discretionary spending to the fiscal 1997 levels requested by President Clinton. See ACU’s vote 6, 1997. ♦ FOR the Legal Services Corporation, the perennial liberal boondoggle that provides political activism disguised as “legal services” to Democratic constituencies. See ACU’s vote 16, 1995, and vote 17, 1999. ♦ FOR corporate welfare, specifically the Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC). See ACU’s vote 23. 1999. ♦ AGAINST worker and shareholder rights, specifically the Hatch (R-UT) amendment to require unions and corporations to obtain permission from dues-paying members or shareholders before spending money on political activities. See ACU’s votes 4 and 5, 2001. ♦ FOR restricting the First Amendment (free speech) rights of independent groups. See ACU’s vote 23, 1997. ♦ FOR President Clinton’s nomination of Dr. David Satcher as U.S. Surgeon General. Among other things, Satcher opposed a full ban on partial-birth abortion. See ACU’s vote 1, 1998. ♦ FOR handouts to politicians, specifically taxpayer funding of presidential campaigns. See ACU’s vote 6, 1995. ♦ FOR handouts to politicians, specifically congressional perks such as postage and broadcast time funded by taxpayers. See ACU’s vote 13, 1996. ♦ AGAINST property rights and FOR unlimited presidential power, specifically by allowing President Clinton to implement the American Heritage Rivers Initiative, which he established by executive order, without congressional approval. See ACU’s vote 20, 1997. ♦ FOR affirmative action in federal contracts. See ACU’s vote 9, 1995. ♦ FOR an increase in the minimum wage, which, of course, increases unemployment among the young and poor. See ACU’s vote 16, 1996. ♦ FOR open-ended military commitments, specifically in regard to U.S. troops in Kosovo. See ACU’s vote 8, 2000. ♦ FOR the trial lawyers lobby, and specifically against a bill that would put common-sense limitations on the medical malpractice suits that increase health costs for all of us. (Of course! He’s been a trial lawyer himself for some three decades.) See ACU’s vote 18, 2002. ♦ FOR allowing the IRS to require political and policy organizations to disclose their membership—a vote against the constitutional rights of free association and privacy. (The Clinton Administration used such IRS intimidation against conservative groups that opposed them.) See ACU’s vote 11, 2000. ♦ AGAINST impeachment proceedings against President Clinton, specifically the reappointment and reauthorization of managers (drawn from the Republican membership of the House Judiciary Committee) to conduct the impeachment trial in the Senate. See ACU’s vote 1, 1999. There you have it. The actor who talks like a tough conservative has, in his real political life, voted in all these ways to increase the power of the federal government, limit the rights of taxpayers and individual citizens, and shut grassroots activists out of the political process. Ronald Reagan he is NOT! http://www.conservativesbetrayed.com/gw3/articles-latestnews/articles.php?CMSArticleID=1827&CMSCategoryID=19 I will be voting for Ron Paul.
Category: Elections

How would you feel if Mexican trucks never got NAFTA cross-border approval?

http://www.mysanantonio.com/business/stories/MYSA060107.02C.freetrade0601.2aa2d46.html "A controversial provision of the North American Free Trade Agreement that would allow Mexican trucks access to U.S. roadways may never happen, a South Texas congressman said Thursday in San Antonio. "I dont know if were ever going to have cross-border trucking," Rep. Charlie Gonzalez, D-San Antonio, said at the Free Trade Alliance San Antonios annual free-trade luncheon.... Early this year, the Department of Transportation proposed a pilot that would allow a test of NAFTAs cross-border trucking provisions, but a measure signed into law last week will keep that project from going forward as initially planned. The measure, part of emergency war-funding legislation, would increase the regulations under which such a cross-border trucking pilot could be carried out. The measure "pulls the rug out from under the secretary of transportations plans," Gonzalez said. " Thoughts?
Answer: I hope they don't. Aside from the losses our American truckers would take, in Mexico transportation requirements are much more lax. My husband is in the transportation business(rail), and I can't tell you how many problems have arisen from merely doing business with Mexico. Stolen goods, bullet holes, illegals, visa arguments. Mexico may say they will keep in in check, but they seem to have a problem keeping most of their country in check. I would say their carelessness could be a major security threat.
Category: Immigration

Evangelical christians will not back Fred Thompson why?

what did he do that they dont like? I am not sure what their requirements are since they backed the Bush administration. I didnt think they could be that high?
Answer: Fred Thompson is not a real conservative. Conservatives who look to Thompson for salvation need to pause and consider his record—a record that includes these votes: Americans For Better Immigration rated his voting record with a "C" grade. http://www.betterimmigration.com/candidates/2006/prez08_gop1.html Tancredo, Ron Paul, and Hunter all have much more conservative voting records on immigration. http://www.betterimmigration.com/candidates/2006/prez08_gop2.html http://www.betterimmigration.com/candidates/2006/prez08_gop3.html As a confirmed member of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) Thompson would support the North American Union. http://www.eagleforum.org/column/2005/july05/05-07-13.html http://youtube.com/watch?v=kXevDajb2lo The CFR wants to allow Mexican trucks "unlimited access" to the United States, including the hauling of local loads between U.S. cities. The CFR calls for creating a "North American preference" so that employers can recruit low-paid workers from anywhere in North America. No longer will illegal aliens have to be smuggled across the border; employers can openly recruit foreigners willing to work for a fraction of U.S. wages. The CFR plan calls for massive U.S. foreign aid to the other countries. The burden on the U.S. taxpayers will include so-called "multilateral development" from the World Bank and the Inter-American Development Bank, "long-term loans in pesos," and a North American Investment Fund to send U.S. private capital to Mexico. As a proponent of free trade Thompson would support the the NAFTA Superhighway. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MBmFrYWPoG8 http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul349.html http://www.ontheissues.org/senate/Fred_Thompson.htm#Free_Trade "Indeed, the image of the highway, with its Chinese goods whizzing across the border borne by Mexican truckers on a privatized, foreign-operated road, is almost mundane in its plausibility. "Construction of the NAFTA highway from Laredo, Texas to Canada is now underway," read a letter in the February 13 San Gabriel Valley Tribune. "Spain will own most of the toll roads that connect to the superhighway. Mexico will own and operate the Kansas City Smart Port. And NAFTA tribunal, not the U.S. Supreme Court, will have the final word in trade disputes." He also voted: ♦ FOR restricting the rights of grassroots organizations to communicate with the public. See ACU’s vote 3, 1998. ♦ AGAINST an accelerated elimination of the “marriage penalty.” See ACU’s vote 10, 2001. ♦ AGAINST restraints on federal spending, specifically the Phil Gramm (R-TX) amendment to limit non-defense discretionary spending to the fiscal 1997 levels requested by President Clinton. See ACU’s vote 6, 1997. ♦ FOR the Legal Services Corporation, the perennial liberal boondoggle that provides political activism disguised as “legal services” to Democratic constituencies. See ACU’s vote 16, 1995, and vote 17, 1999. ♦ FOR corporate welfare, specifically the Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC). See ACU’s vote 23. 1999. ♦ AGAINST worker and shareholder rights, specifically the Hatch (R-UT) amendment to require unions and corporations to obtain permission from dues-paying members or shareholders before spending money on political activities. See ACU’s votes 4 and 5, 2001. ♦ FOR restricting the First Amendment (free speech) rights of independent groups. See ACU’s vote 23, 1997. ♦ FOR President Clinton’s nomination of Dr. David Satcher as U.S. Surgeon General. Among other things, Satcher opposed a full ban on partial-birth abortion. See ACU’s vote 1, 1998. ♦ FOR handouts to politicians, specifically taxpayer funding of presidential campaigns. See ACU’s vote 6, 1995. ♦ FOR handouts to politicians, specifically congressional perks such as postage and broadcast time funded by taxpayers. See ACU’s vote 13, 1996. ♦ AGAINST property rights and FOR unlimited presidential power, specifically by allowing President Clinton to implement the American Heritage Rivers Initiative, which he established by executive order, without congressional approval. See ACU’s vote 20, 1997. ♦ FOR affirmative action in federal contracts. See ACU’s vote 9, 1995. ♦ FOR an increase in the minimum wage, which, of course, increases unemployment among the young and poor. See ACU’s vote 16, 1996. ♦ FOR open-ended military commitments, specifically in regard to U.S. troops in Kosovo. See ACU’s vote 8, 2000. ♦ FOR the trial lawyers lobby, and specifically against a bill that would put common-sense limitations on the medical malpractice suits that increase health costs for all of us. (Of course! He’s been a trial lawyer himself for some three decades.) See ACU’s vote 18, 2002. ♦ FOR allowing the IRS to require political and policy organizations to disclose their membership—a vote against the constitutional rights of free association and privacy. (The Clinton Administration used such IRS intimidation against conservative groups that opposed them.) See ACU’s vote 11, 2000. ♦ AGAINST impeachment proceedings against President Clinton, specifically the reappointment and reauthorization of managers (drawn from the Republican membership of the House Judiciary Committee) to conduct the impeachment trial in the Senate. See ACU’s vote 1, 1999. There you have it. The actor who talks like a tough conservative has, in his real political life, voted in all these ways to increase the power of the federal government, limit the rights of taxpayers and individual citizens, and shut grassroots activists out of the political process. Ronald Reagan he is NOT! http://www.conservativesbetrayed.com/gw3/articles-latestnews/articles.php?CMSArticleID=1827&CMSCategoryID=19 I will be voting for Ron Paul.
Category: Politics

Is Fred Thompson the other internet candidate?

Hes been in ZERO debates Barely announced (less serious than his supporters) Lead in less polls and straw polls than Ron Paul Is he just the counter example by neocon bloggers to respond to Ron Paul? Or is he more? What are famous bloggers that support another major candidate?
Answer: Fred Thompson is not a real conservative. Conservatives who look to Thompson for salvation need to pause and consider his record—a record that includes these votes: Americans For Better Immigration rated his voting record with a "C" grade. http://www.betterimmigration.com/candidates/2006/prez08_gop1.html Tancredo, Ron Paul, and Hunter all have much more conservative voting records on immigration. http://www.betterimmigration.com/candidates/2006/prez08_gop2.html http://www.betterimmigration.com/candidates/2006/prez08_gop3.html As a confirmed member of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) Thompson would support the North American Union. http://www.eagleforum.org/column/2005/july05/05-07-13.html http://youtube.com/watch?v=kXevDajb2lo The CFR wants to allow Mexican trucks "unlimited access" to the United States, including the hauling of local loads between U.S. cities. The CFR calls for creating a "North American preference" so that employers can recruit low-paid workers from anywhere in North America. No longer will illegal aliens have to be smuggled across the border; employers can openly recruit foreigners willing to work for a fraction of U.S. wages. The CFR plan calls for massive U.S. foreign aid to the other countries. The burden on the U.S. taxpayers will include so-called "multilateral development" from the World Bank and the Inter-American Development Bank, "long-term loans in pesos," and a North American Investment Fund to send U.S. private capital to Mexico. As a proponent of free trade Thompson would support the the NAFTA Superhighway. http://news.yahoo.com/s/thenation/20070809/cm_thenation/20070827hayes_1 http://www.ontheissues.org/senate/Fred_Thompson.htm#Free_Trade "Indeed, the image of the highway, with its Chinese goods whizzing across the border borne by Mexican truckers on a privatized, foreign-operated road, is almost mundane in its plausibility. "Construction of the NAFTA highway from Laredo, Texas to Canada is now underway," read a letter in the February 13 San Gabriel Valley Tribune. "Spain will own most of the toll roads that connect to the superhighway. Mexico will own and operate the Kansas City Smart Port. And NAFTA tribunal, not the U.S. Supreme Court, will have the final word in trade disputes." He also voted: ♦ FOR restricting the rights of grassroots organizations to communicate with the public. See ACU’s vote 3, 1998. ♦ AGAINST an accelerated elimination of the “marriage penalty.” See ACU’s vote 10, 2001. ♦ AGAINST restraints on federal spending, specifically the Phil Gramm (R-TX) amendment to limit non-defense discretionary spending to the fiscal 1997 levels requested by President Clinton. See ACU’s vote 6, 1997. ♦ FOR the Legal Services Corporation, the perennial liberal boondoggle that provides political activism disguised as “legal services” to Democratic constituencies. See ACU’s vote 16, 1995, and vote 17, 1999. ♦ FOR corporate welfare, specifically the Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC). See ACU’s vote 23. 1999. ♦ AGAINST worker and shareholder rights, specifically the Hatch (R-UT) amendment to require unions and corporations to obtain permission from dues-paying members or shareholders before spending money on political activities. See ACU’s votes 4 and 5, 2001. ♦ FOR restricting the First Amendment (free speech) rights of independent groups. See ACU’s vote 23, 1997. ♦ FOR President Clinton’s nomination of Dr. David Satcher as U.S. Surgeon General. Among other things, Satcher opposed a full ban on partial-birth abortion. See ACU’s vote 1, 1998. ♦ FOR handouts to politicians, specifically taxpayer funding of presidential campaigns. See ACU’s vote 6, 1995. ♦ FOR handouts to politicians, specifically congressional perks such as postage and broadcast time funded by taxpayers. See ACU’s vote 13, 1996. ♦ AGAINST property rights and FOR unlimited presidential power, specifically by allowing President Clinton to implement the American Heritage Rivers Initiative, which he established by executive order, without congressional approval. See ACU’s vote 20, 1997. ♦ FOR affirmative action in federal contracts. See ACU’s vote 9, 1995. ♦ FOR an increase in the minimum wage, which, of course, increases unemployment among the young and poor. See ACU’s vote 16, 1996. ♦ FOR open-ended military commitments, specifically in regard to U.S. troops in Kosovo. See ACU’s vote 8, 2000. ♦ FOR the trial lawyers lobby, and specifically against a bill that would put common-sense limitations on the medical malpractice suits that increase health costs for all of us. (Of course! He’s been a trial lawyer himself for some three decades.) See ACU’s vote 18, 2002. ♦ FOR allowing the IRS to require political and policy organizations to disclose their membership—a vote against the constitutional rights of free association and privacy. (The Clinton Administration used such IRS intimidation against conservative groups that opposed them.) See ACU’s vote 11, 2000. ♦ AGAINST impeachment proceedings against President Clinton, specifically the reappointment and reauthorization of managers (drawn from the Republican membership of the House Judiciary Committee) to conduct the impeachment trial in the Senate. See ACU’s vote 1, 1999. There you have it. The actor who talks like a tough conservative has, in his real political life, voted in all these ways to increase the power of the federal government, limit the rights of taxpayers and individual citizens, and shut grassroots activists out of the political process. Ronald Reagan he is NOT! http://www.conservativesbetrayed.com/gw3/articles-latestnews/articles.php?CMSArticleID=1827&CMSCategoryID=19 I will be voting for Ron Paul. Among all candidates, Dr. Paul is now first in total donations from military personnel and veterans. Obama and McCain were second and third in donations from military and veterans. http://phreadom.blogspot.com/2007/07/ron-paul-is-most-financially-military.html http://query.nictusa.com/pres/2007/Q2/ 1 Paul http://query.nictusa.com/pres/2007/Q2/C00432914/A_EMPLOYER_C00432914.html 2 Obama http://query.nictusa.com/pres/2007/Q2/C00431445/A_EMPLOYER_C00431445.html 3 McCain http://query.nictusa.com/pres/2007/Q2/C00430470/A_EMPLOYER_C00430470.html 4 Clinton http://query.nictusa.com/pres/2007/Q2/C00431569/A_EMPLOYER_C00431569.html 5 Richardson http://query.nictusa.com/pres/2007/Q2/C00431577/A_EMPLOYER_C00431577.html 6 Romney http://query.nictusa.com/pres/2007/Q2/C00431171/A_EMPLOYER_C00431171.html 7 Edwards http://query.nictusa.com/pres/2007/Q2/C00431205/A_ELECTION_C00431205.html 8 Giuliani http://query.nictusa.com/pres/2007/Q2/C00430512/A_EMPLOYER_C00430512.html Tancredo, Ron Paul, and Hunter have the most conservative voting records on immigration. http://www.betterimmigration.com/candidates/2006/prez08_gop2.html http://www.betterimmigration.com/candidates/2006/prez08_gop3.html http://www.betterimmigration.com/candidates/2006/prez08_gop1.html Tancredo and Ron Paul have the best voting records for reducing government spending according to the National Taxpayers Union. They were the only candidates to score 100 percent "A" Grades from 1992 to 2005. http://www.ntu.org/main/page.php?PageID=97# Sportsbook.com rates both Paul and Romney at 8 to 1 odds which is approximately an 11 percent chance of becoming the next President. Mitt Romney's campaign only had 35 percent more cash than Ron Paul after subtracting debts on 06/30/2007. http://herndon1.sdrdc.com/cgi-bin/cancomsrs/?_08+P80000748 http://herndon1.sdrdc.com/cgi-bin/cancomsrs/?_08+P80003353 Paul's campaign has almost 5 times as much money to spend as Tancredo. http://herndon1.sdrdc.com/cgi-bin/cancomsrs/?_08+P80003429 Romney's contributions from individuals dropped by a third from the first quarter to the second quarter. Paul's contributions almost quadrupled from Q1 to Q2. http://projects.washingtonpost.com/2008-presidential-candidates/?nid=roll_08campaign Ron Paul received more than 10 times as much in donations in the last week of June as he received in the first week of April. http://query.nictusa.com/pres/2007/Q2/C00432914/A_DATE_C00432914.html Ron Paul's $2.4 million in fundraising after the second quarter placed him: 4th in total receipts to date 3rd in total current assets (ahead of former front-runner John McCain, and just $800,000 behind Mitt Romney) Thus far, 47% of the contributions made to Ron Paul's campaign are donations of under $200 from individuals (John McCain's 17% is the second-highest percentage). http://www.usaelectionpolls.com/2008/articles/ron-paul-small-donors-love-him.html This is a telling statistic, as it highlights the fact that most other candidates rely heavily upon donations from corporate interests and political action committees (PACs) (i.e. moneyed, influence-seeking sources who can readily afford to contribute large sums). Since Congressman Paul has always voted against special favors and privileges for anyone, special interests know they have nothing to gain by stuffing Ron Paul's campaign coffers. As one member of my local Meetup group put it on a home-made sign, "Ron Paul is thin because he won't let special interests buy him lunch." http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig8/sutton1.html
Category: Elections

OOIDA's latest lawsuit to stop Cross Border trucking with Mexico is ...

I guess that's a fancy word for nanny management while they Mexicans are given a free pass. Again, a blatant misstatement. Canada is rarely ... The US does! Mexico does, but Canada gets a pass from OOIDA. It's against the law in Canada to impose drug testing on truckers. The Canada Human Rights Commission says this about the subject. Drivers denied employment opportunities or who face disciplinary or other discriminatory employment consequences in ...

North Texas trucker could soon be freed from Mexican jail - WFAA.com

1 day ago ... The El Norte newspaper said Jabin Bogan will be set free if he pays a $1500 fine. Bogan was accused of illegally entering Mexico with a ...

Where do I get to see Fred Thompson videos from these past two days?

(online)
Answer: You can watch the newest Fred Thompson videos here. http://www.youtube.com/results?search_type=search_videos&search_query=Fred%20Thompson&search_sort=video_date_uploaded&search_category=0&search=Search&v=&uploaded= Fred Thompson is not a real conservative. Conservatives who look to Thompson for salvation need to pause and consider his record—a record that includes these votes: Americans For Better Immigration rated his voting record with a "C" grade. http://www.betterimmigration.com/candidates/2006/prez08_gop1.html Tancredo, Ron Paul, and Hunter all have much more conservative voting records on immigration. http://www.betterimmigration.com/candidates/2006/prez08_gop2.html http://www.betterimmigration.com/candidates/2006/prez08_gop3.html As a confirmed member of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) Thompson would support the North American Union. The CFR wants to allow Mexican trucks "unlimited access" to the United States, including the hauling of local loads between U.S. cities. The CFR calls for creating a "North American preference" so that employers can recruit low-paid workers from anywhere in North America. No longer will illegal aliens have to be smuggled across the border; employers can openly recruit foreigners willing to work for a fraction of U.S. wages. The CFR plan calls for massive U.S. foreign aid to the other countries. The burden on the U.S. taxpayers will include so-called "multilateral development" from the World Bank and the Inter-American Development Bank, "long-term loans in pesos," and a North American Investment Fund to send U.S. private capital to Mexico. http://www.eagleforum.org/column/2005/july05/05-07-13.html http://youtube.com/watch?v=kXevDajb2lo As a proponent of free trade Thompson would support the the NAFTA Superhighway. http://news.yahoo.com/s/thenation/20070809/cm_thenation/20070827hayes_1 "Indeed, the image of the highway, with its Chinese goods whizzing across the border borne by Mexican truckers on a privatized, foreign-operated road, is almost mundane in its plausibility. "Construction of the NAFTA highway from Laredo, Texas to Canada is now underway," read a letter in the February 13 San Gabriel Valley Tribune. "Spain will own most of the toll roads that connect to the superhighway. Mexico will own and operate the Kansas City Smart Port. And NAFTA tribunal, not the U.S. Supreme Court, will have the final word in trade disputes." He also voted: ♦ FOR restricting the rights of grassroots organizations to communicate with the public. See ACU’s vote 3, 1998. ♦ AGAINST an accelerated elimination of the “marriage penalty.” See ACU’s vote 10, 2001. ♦ AGAINST restraints on federal spending, specifically the Phil Gramm (R-TX) amendment to limit non-defense discretionary spending to the fiscal 1997 levels requested by President Clinton. See ACU’s vote 6, 1997. ♦ FOR the Legal Services Corporation, the perennial liberal boondoggle that provides political activism disguised as “legal services” to Democratic constituencies. See ACU’s vote 16, 1995, and vote 17, 1999. ♦ FOR corporate welfare, specifically the Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC). See ACU’s vote 23. 1999. ♦ AGAINST worker and shareholder rights, specifically the Hatch (R-UT) amendment to require unions and corporations to obtain permission from dues-paying members or shareholders before spending money on political activities. See ACU’s votes 4 and 5, 2001. ♦ FOR restricting the First Amendment (free speech) rights of independent groups. See ACU’s vote 23, 1997. ♦ FOR President Clinton’s nomination of Dr. David Satcher as U.S. Surgeon General. Among other things, Satcher opposed a full ban on partial-birth abortion. See ACU’s vote 1, 1998. ♦ FOR handouts to politicians, specifically taxpayer funding of presidential campaigns. See ACU’s vote 6, 1995. ♦ FOR handouts to politicians, specifically congressional perks such as postage and broadcast time funded by taxpayers. See ACU’s vote 13, 1996. ♦ AGAINST property rights and FOR unlimited presidential power, specifically by allowing President Clinton to implement the American Heritage Rivers Initiative, which he established by executive order, without congressional approval. See ACU’s vote 20, 1997. ♦ FOR affirmative action in federal contracts. See ACU’s vote 9, 1995. ♦ FOR an increase in the minimum wage, which, of course, increases unemployment among the young and poor. See ACU’s vote 16, 1996. ♦ FOR open-ended military commitments, specifically in regard to U.S. troops in Kosovo. See ACU’s vote 8, 2000. ♦ FOR the trial lawyers lobby, and specifically against a bill that would put common-sense limitations on the medical malpractice suits that increase health costs for all of us. (Of course! He’s been a trial lawyer himself for some three decades.) See ACU’s vote 18, 2002. ♦ FOR allowing the IRS to require political and policy organizations to disclose their membership—a vote against the constitutional rights of free association and privacy. (The Clinton Administration used such IRS intimidation against conservative groups that opposed them.) See ACU’s vote 11, 2000. ♦ AGAINST impeachment proceedings against President Clinton, specifically the reappointment and reauthorization of managers (drawn from the Republican membership of the House Judiciary Committee) to conduct the impeachment trial in the Senate. See ACU’s vote 1, 1999. There you have it. The actor who talks like a tough conservative has, in his real political life, voted in all these ways to increase the power of the federal government, limit the rights of taxpayers and individual citizens, and shut grassroots activists out of the political process. Ronald Reagan he is NOT! http://www.conservativesbetrayed.com/gw3/articles-latestnews/articles.php?CMSArticleID=1827&CMSCategoryID=19 I will be voting for Ron Paul.
Category: Elections

Where is a good place to visit mexico near the border?

Me and a couple of friends are planning a trip to Mexico in February or March and are wondering where is a good place to vacation near the border. We are going to drive from South Dakota. Hopefully it is a safe place
Answer: If you want to get a feel for Mexico you need to move past the boarder. The boarder cities, Cuidad Jaurez, Neuvo Laredo, Reynosa suffer from narco turf battles, drug crime, poverty, etc. You will be treated like a wallet, not a person. At the same time, the US citizen that go to those towns are usually not on their best behavior and don't leave the best impression. You will probably be heading down I-35 and enter through Nuevo Laredo. I would suggest going to Monterrey. It is one of the larger cities in the country and it's only 2.5 hours drive. To go that far into Mexico you will need your passport stamped and pay a refundable fee to take your car in. You get the fee refunded back to your credit card when you check out on the way out. It is to insure you don't sell the car there. When you leave Neuvo Laredo going south you have the option of taking the free highway or the tollway. Take the toll way! The truckers on the free road are way to dangerous for you, I promise. In Monterrey you have a good taste of real Mexican culture. The city has been heavily influenced by the US and it carries many similarities to San Antonio, but it has a historic center and an up scale area as well with standard hotels if your squeamish. There will be plenty to see. I recommend dropping by a book store and thumbing through the Lonely Planet guide to Mexico or downloading that chapter off the website for 3 bucks. It will give you hotels and attractions. If you don't want to drive in Mexico you can take a bus from the boarder. Mexican buses are much nicer than US buses and they are cheap. Mexican traffic cops can be a pain. Bribes can get expensive without Spanish. On the way back don't forget to stop in Austin Texas, it is a blast.
Category: Other - Mexico

Feds bust North Texas drug gang that imported 'Mexican Ice' meth ...

A Mexican newspaper says a North Texas truck driver imprisoned in Mexico will be released — but there's a condition. The El Norte newspaper said Jabin ...

Used semi trucks

If you didn't find what you were looking for, please feel free to ... truckers against trafficking efforts one the n north texas trucker could soon freed from mexican jail ...

Jabin Akeem “Wrong Way” - Mexico Trucker Online

When he will be released, or where and when he will return to the United States is unknown at this time. Also unknown is how this conviction in the Mexican justice system will effect his probation out of Bexar County Texas.

Last fatality-free day on Texas roads was 12 years ago today - I4U ...

A Mexican newspaper says a North Texas truck driver imprisoned in Mexico will be released — but there's a condition. The El Norte newspaper said Jabin ...

Texas Insider » Mexico Trucking Issue Hits Home for U.S. Agriculture

Texas Insider Report: AUSTIN, Texas – The Border Trade Alliance earlier this month expressed its optimism that a framework announced by President Barack Obama & Mexican President Felipe Calderón for setting the trucking issue ... because the dispute over trucking dates back to the Clinton administration, when bogus claims over truck safety and environmental damage first won out over the need to comply with the North American Free Trade Agreement signed ...

Fred Thompson supporters: What specific policies has he outlined that cause you to support him?

Answer: Fred Thompson is not a real conservative. Conservatives who look to Thompson for salvation need to pause and consider his record—a record that includes these votes: Americans For Better Immigration rated his voting record with a "C" grade. http://www.betterimmigration.com/candidates/2006/prez08_gop1.html Tancredo, Ron Paul, and Hunter all have much more conservative voting records on immigration. http://www.betterimmigration.com/candidates/2006/prez08_gop2.html http://www.betterimmigration.com/candidates/2006/prez08_gop3.html As a confirmed member of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) Thompson would support the North American Union. The CFR wants to allow Mexican trucks "unlimited access" to the United States, including the hauling of local loads between U.S. cities. The CFR calls for creating a "North American preference" so that employers can recruit low-paid workers from anywhere in North America. No longer will illegal aliens have to be smuggled across the border; employers can openly recruit foreigners willing to work for a fraction of U.S. wages. The CFR plan calls for massive U.S. foreign aid to the other countries. The burden on the U.S. taxpayers will include so-called "multilateral development" from the World Bank and the Inter-American Development Bank, "long-term loans in pesos," and a North American Investment Fund to send U.S. private capital to Mexico. http://www.eagleforum.org/column/2005/july05/05-07-13.html http://youtube.com/watch?v=kXevDajb2lo As a proponent of free trade Thompson would support the the NAFTA Superhighway. http://news.yahoo.com/s/thenation/20070809/cm_thenation/20070827hayes_1 "Indeed, the image of the highway, with its Chinese goods whizzing across the border borne by Mexican truckers on a privatized, foreign-operated road, is almost mundane in its plausibility. "Construction of the NAFTA highway from Laredo, Texas to Canada is now underway," read a letter in the February 13 San Gabriel Valley Tribune. "Spain will own most of the toll roads that connect to the superhighway. Mexico will own and operate the Kansas City Smart Port. And NAFTA tribunal, not the U.S. Supreme Court, will have the final word in trade disputes." He also voted: ♦ FOR restricting the rights of grassroots organizations to communicate with the public. See ACU’s vote 3, 1998. ♦ AGAINST an accelerated elimination of the “marriage penalty.” See ACU’s vote 10, 2001. ♦ AGAINST restraints on federal spending, specifically the Phil Gramm (R-TX) amendment to limit non-defense discretionary spending to the fiscal 1997 levels requested by President Clinton. See ACU’s vote 6, 1997. ♦ FOR the Legal Services Corporation, the perennial liberal boondoggle that provides political activism disguised as “legal services” to Democratic constituencies. See ACU’s vote 16, 1995, and vote 17, 1999. ♦ FOR corporate welfare, specifically the Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC). See ACU’s vote 23. 1999. ♦ AGAINST worker and shareholder rights, specifically the Hatch (R-UT) amendment to require unions and corporations to obtain permission from dues-paying members or shareholders before spending money on political activities. See ACU’s votes 4 and 5, 2001. ♦ FOR restricting the First Amendment (free speech) rights of independent groups. See ACU’s vote 23, 1997. ♦ FOR President Clinton’s nomination of Dr. David Satcher as U.S. Surgeon General. Among other things, Satcher opposed a full ban on partial-birth abortion. See ACU’s vote 1, 1998. ♦ FOR handouts to politicians, specifically taxpayer funding of presidential campaigns. See ACU’s vote 6, 1995. ♦ FOR handouts to politicians, specifically congressional perks such as postage and broadcast time funded by taxpayers. See ACU’s vote 13, 1996. ♦ AGAINST property rights and FOR unlimited presidential power, specifically by allowing President Clinton to implement the American Heritage Rivers Initiative, which he established by executive order, without congressional approval. See ACU’s vote 20, 1997. ♦ FOR affirmative action in federal contracts. See ACU’s vote 9, 1995. ♦ FOR an increase in the minimum wage, which, of course, increases unemployment among the young and poor. See ACU’s vote 16, 1996. ♦ FOR open-ended military commitments, specifically in regard to U.S. troops in Kosovo. See ACU’s vote 8, 2000. ♦ FOR the trial lawyers lobby, and specifically against a bill that would put common-sense limitations on the medical malpractice suits that increase health costs for all of us. (Of course! He’s been a trial lawyer himself for some three decades.) See ACU’s vote 18, 2002. ♦ FOR allowing the IRS to require political and policy organizations to disclose their membership—a vote against the constitutional rights of free association and privacy. (The Clinton Administration used such IRS intimidation against conservative groups that opposed them.) See ACU’s vote 11, 2000. ♦ AGAINST impeachment proceedings against President Clinton, specifically the reappointment and reauthorization of managers (drawn from the Republican membership of the House Judiciary Committee) to conduct the impeachment trial in the Senate. See ACU’s vote 1, 1999. There you have it. The actor who talks like a tough conservative has, in his real political life, voted in all these ways to increase the power of the federal government, limit the rights of taxpayers and individual citizens, and shut grassroots activists out of the political process. Ronald Reagan he is NOT! http://www.conservativesbetrayed.com/gw3/articles-latestnews/articles.php?CMSArticleID=1827&CMSCategoryID=19 I will be voting for Ron Paul.
Category: Politics

If Fred Thompson wins, who is he going to bring into his “Law and Order” administration ?

Answer: He will probably lose. Fred Thompson is not a real conservative. Conservatives who look to Thompson for salvation need to pause and consider his record—a record that includes these votes: Americans For Better Immigration rated his voting record with a "C" grade. http://www.betterimmigration.com/candidates/2006/prez08_gop1.html Tancredo, Ron Paul, and Hunter all have much more conservative voting records on immigration. http://www.betterimmigration.com/candidates/2006/prez08_gop2.html As a confirmed member of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) Thompson would support the North American Union. http://www.eagleforum.org/column/2005/july05/05-07-13.html http://youtube.com/watch?v=kXevDajb2lo The CFR wants to allow Mexican trucks "unlimited access" to the United States, including the hauling of local loads between U.S. cities. The CFR calls for creating a "North American preference" so that employers can recruit low-paid workers from anywhere in North America. No longer will illegal aliens have to be smuggled across the border; employers can openly recruit foreigners willing to work for a fraction of U.S. wages. The CFR plan calls for massive U.S. foreign aid to the other countries. The burden on the U.S. taxpayers will include so-called "multilateral development" from the World Bank and the Inter-American Development Bank, "long-term loans in pesos," and a North American Investment Fund to send U.S. private capital to Mexico. As a proponent of free trade Thompson would support the the NAFTA Superhighway. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MBmFrYWPoG8 http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul349.html http://www.ontheissues.org/senate/Fred_Thompson.htm#Free_Trade "Indeed, the image of the highway, with its Chinese goods whizzing across the border borne by Mexican truckers on a privatized, foreign-operated road, is almost mundane in its plausibility. "Construction of the NAFTA highway from Laredo, Texas to Canada is now underway," read a letter in the February 13 San Gabriel Valley Tribune. "Spain will own most of the toll roads that connect to the superhighway. Mexico will own and operate the Kansas City Smart Port. And NAFTA tribunal, not the U.S. Supreme Court, will have the final word in trade disputes." He also voted: ♦ FOR restricting the rights of grassroots organizations to communicate with the public. See ACU’s vote 3, 1998. ♦ AGAINST an accelerated elimination of the “marriage penalty.” See ACU’s vote 10, 2001. ♦ AGAINST restraints on federal spending, specifically the Phil Gramm (R-TX) amendment to limit non-defense discretionary spending to the fiscal 1997 levels requested by President Clinton. See ACU’s vote 6, 1997. ♦ FOR the Legal Services Corporation, the perennial liberal boondoggle that provides political activism disguised as “legal services” to Democratic constituencies. See ACU’s vote 16, 1995, and vote 17, 1999. ♦ FOR corporate welfare, specifically the Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC). See ACU’s vote 23. 1999. ♦ AGAINST worker and shareholder rights, specifically the Hatch (R-UT) amendment to require unions and corporations to obtain permission from dues-paying members or shareholders before spending money on political activities. See ACU’s votes 4 and 5, 2001. ♦ FOR restricting the First Amendment (free speech) rights of independent groups. See ACU’s vote 23, 1997. ♦ FOR President Clinton’s nomination of Dr. David Satcher as U.S. Surgeon General. Among other things, Satcher opposed a full ban on partial-birth abortion. See ACU’s vote 1, 1998. ♦ FOR handouts to politicians, specifically taxpayer funding of presidential campaigns. See ACU’s vote 6, 1995. ♦ FOR handouts to politicians, specifically congressional perks such as postage and broadcast time funded by taxpayers. See ACU’s vote 13, 1996. ♦ AGAINST property rights and FOR unlimited presidential power, specifically by allowing President Clinton to implement the American Heritage Rivers Initiative, which he established by executive order, without congressional approval. See ACU’s vote 20, 1997. ♦ FOR affirmative action in federal contracts. See ACU’s vote 9, 1995. ♦ FOR an increase in the minimum wage, which, of course, increases unemployment among the young and poor. See ACU’s vote 16, 1996. ♦ FOR open-ended military commitments, specifically in regard to U.S. troops in Kosovo. See ACU’s vote 8, 2000. ♦ FOR the trial lawyers lobby, and specifically against a bill that would put common-sense limitations on the medical malpractice suits that increase health costs for all of us. (Of course! He’s been a trial lawyer himself for some three decades.) See ACU’s vote 18, 2002. ♦ FOR allowing the IRS to require political and policy organizations to disclose their membership—a vote against the constitutional rights of free association and privacy. (The Clinton Administration used such IRS intimidation against conservative groups that opposed them.) See ACU’s vote 11, 2000. ♦ AGAINST impeachment proceedings against President Clinton, specifically the reappointment and reauthorization of managers (drawn from the Republican membership of the House Judiciary Committee) to conduct the impeachment trial in the Senate. See ACU’s vote 1, 1999. There you have it. The actor who talks like a tough conservative has, in his real political life, voted in all these ways to increase the power of the federal government, limit the rights of taxpayers and individual citizens, and shut grassroots activists out of the political process. Ronald Reagan he is NOT! http://www.conservativesbetrayed.com/gw3/articles-latestnews/articles.php?CMSArticleID=1827&CMSCategoryID=19 I will be voting for Ron Paul.
Category: Elections

If Fred Thompson is elected President, will he set a new record for vacation days off from the White House?

All signs point to "lazy". http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18999838/site/newsweek/ Being the leader of the free world is a 24 hour, high stress job. I dont think Bed Head Fred will last two weeks in the oval office...
Answer: Fred Thompson is not a real conservative. Conservatives who look to Thompson for salvation need to pause and consider his record—a record that includes these votes: Americans For Better Immigration rated his voting record with a "C" grade. http://www.betterimmigration.com/candidates/2006/prez08_gop1.html Tancredo, Ron Paul, and Hunter all have much more conservative voting records on immigration. http://www.betterimmigration.com/candidates/2006/prez08_gop2.html As a confirmed member of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) Thompson would support the North American Union. http://www.eagleforum.org/column/2005/july05/05-07-13.html http://youtube.com/watch?v=kXevDajb2lo The CFR wants to allow Mexican trucks "unlimited access" to the United States, including the hauling of local loads between U.S. cities. The CFR calls for creating a "North American preference" so that employers can recruit low-paid workers from anywhere in North America. No longer will illegal aliens have to be smuggled across the border; employers can openly recruit foreigners willing to work for a fraction of U.S. wages. The CFR plan calls for massive U.S. foreign aid to the other countries. The burden on the U.S. taxpayers will include so-called "multilateral development" from the World Bank and the Inter-American Development Bank, "long-term loans in pesos," and a North American Investment Fund to send U.S. private capital to Mexico. As a proponent of free trade Thompson would support the the NAFTA Superhighway. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MBmFrYWPoG8 http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul349.html http://www.ontheissues.org/senate/Fred_Thompson.htm#Free_Trade "Indeed, the image of the highway, with its Chinese goods whizzing across the border borne by Mexican truckers on a privatized, foreign-operated road, is almost mundane in its plausibility. "Construction of the NAFTA highway from Laredo, Texas to Canada is now underway," read a letter in the February 13 San Gabriel Valley Tribune. "Spain will own most of the toll roads that connect to the superhighway. Mexico will own and operate the Kansas City Smart Port. And NAFTA tribunal, not the U.S. Supreme Court, will have the final word in trade disputes." He also voted: ♦ FOR restricting the rights of grassroots organizations to communicate with the public. See ACU’s vote 3, 1998. ♦ AGAINST an accelerated elimination of the “marriage penalty.” See ACU’s vote 10, 2001. ♦ AGAINST restraints on federal spending, specifically the Phil Gramm (R-TX) amendment to limit non-defense discretionary spending to the fiscal 1997 levels requested by President Clinton. See ACU’s vote 6, 1997. ♦ FOR the Legal Services Corporation, the perennial liberal boondoggle that provides political activism disguised as “legal services” to Democratic constituencies. See ACU’s vote 16, 1995, and vote 17, 1999. ♦ FOR corporate welfare, specifically the Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC). See ACU’s vote 23. 1999. ♦ AGAINST worker and shareholder rights, specifically the Hatch (R-UT) amendment to require unions and corporations to obtain permission from dues-paying members or shareholders before spending money on political activities. See ACU’s votes 4 and 5, 2001. ♦ FOR restricting the First Amendment (free speech) rights of independent groups. See ACU’s vote 23, 1997. ♦ FOR President Clinton’s nomination of Dr. David Satcher as U.S. Surgeon General. Among other things, Satcher opposed a full ban on partial-birth abortion. See ACU’s vote 1, 1998. ♦ FOR handouts to politicians, specifically taxpayer funding of presidential campaigns. See ACU’s vote 6, 1995. ♦ FOR handouts to politicians, specifically congressional perks such as postage and broadcast time funded by taxpayers. See ACU’s vote 13, 1996. ♦ AGAINST property rights and FOR unlimited presidential power, specifically by allowing President Clinton to implement the American Heritage Rivers Initiative, which he established by executive order, without congressional approval. See ACU’s vote 20, 1997. ♦ FOR affirmative action in federal contracts. See ACU’s vote 9, 1995. ♦ FOR an increase in the minimum wage, which, of course, increases unemployment among the young and poor. See ACU’s vote 16, 1996. ♦ FOR open-ended military commitments, specifically in regard to U.S. troops in Kosovo. See ACU’s vote 8, 2000. ♦ FOR the trial lawyers lobby, and specifically against a bill that would put common-sense limitations on the medical malpractice suits that increase health costs for all of us. (Of course! He’s been a trial lawyer himself for some three decades.) See ACU’s vote 18, 2002. ♦ FOR allowing the IRS to require political and policy organizations to disclose their membership—a vote against the constitutional rights of free association and privacy. (The Clinton Administration used such IRS intimidation against conservative groups that opposed them.) See ACU’s vote 11, 2000. ♦ AGAINST impeachment proceedings against President Clinton, specifically the reappointment and reauthorization of managers (drawn from the Republican membership of the House Judiciary Committee) to conduct the impeachment trial in the Senate. See ACU’s vote 1, 1999. There you have it. The actor who talks like a tough conservative has, in his real political life, voted in all these ways to increase the power of the federal government, limit the rights of taxpayers and individual citizens, and shut grassroots activists out of the political process. Ronald Reagan he is NOT! http://www.conservativesbetrayed.com/gw3/articles-latestnews/articles.php?CMSArticleID=1827&CMSCategoryID=19 I will be voting for Ron Paul.
Category: Politics

North Texas trucker could soon be freed from Mexican jail

1 day ago ... A Mexican newspaper says a North Texas truck driver imprisoned in Mexico will be released — but there's a condition. The El Norte newspaper ...

If Fred Thompson is elected president, will he restore law and order in this country?

What will be the first thing he does as acting president? Will he be a commercial success?
Answer: Fred Thompson is not a real conservative. Conservatives who look to Thompson for salvation need to pause and consider his record—a record that includes these votes: Americans For Better Immigration rated his voting record with a "C" grade. http://www.betterimmigration.com/candidates/2006/prez08_gop1.html Tancredo, Ron Paul, and Hunter all have much more conservative voting records on immigration. http://www.betterimmigration.com/candidates/2006/prez08_gop2.html As a confirmed member of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) Thompson would support the North American Union. http://www.eagleforum.org/column/2005/july05/05-07-13.html http://youtube.com/watch?v=kXevDajb2lo The CFR wants to allow Mexican trucks "unlimited access" to the United States, including the hauling of local loads between U.S. cities. The CFR calls for creating a "North American preference" so that employers can recruit low-paid workers from anywhere in North America. No longer will illegal aliens have to be smuggled across the border; employers can openly recruit foreigners willing to work for a fraction of U.S. wages. The CFR plan calls for massive U.S. foreign aid to the other countries. The burden on the U.S. taxpayers will include so-called "multilateral development" from the World Bank and the Inter-American Development Bank, "long-term loans in pesos," and a North American Investment Fund to send U.S. private capital to Mexico. As a proponent of free trade Thompson would support the the NAFTA Superhighway. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MBmFrYWPoG8 http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul349.html http://www.ontheissues.org/senate/Fred_Thompson.htm#Free_Trade "Indeed, the image of the highway, with its Chinese goods whizzing across the border borne by Mexican truckers on a privatized, foreign-operated road, is almost mundane in its plausibility. "Construction of the NAFTA highway from Laredo, Texas to Canada is now underway," read a letter in the February 13 San Gabriel Valley Tribune. "Spain will own most of the toll roads that connect to the superhighway. Mexico will own and operate the Kansas City Smart Port. And NAFTA tribunal, not the U.S. Supreme Court, will have the final word in trade disputes." He also voted: ♦ FOR restricting the rights of grassroots organizations to communicate with the public. See ACU’s vote 3, 1998. ♦ AGAINST an accelerated elimination of the “marriage penalty.” See ACU’s vote 10, 2001. ♦ AGAINST restraints on federal spending, specifically the Phil Gramm (R-TX) amendment to limit non-defense discretionary spending to the fiscal 1997 levels requested by President Clinton. See ACU’s vote 6, 1997. ♦ FOR the Legal Services Corporation, the perennial liberal boondoggle that provides political activism disguised as “legal services” to Democratic constituencies. See ACU’s vote 16, 1995, and vote 17, 1999. ♦ FOR corporate welfare, specifically the Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC). See ACU’s vote 23. 1999. ♦ AGAINST worker and shareholder rights, specifically the Hatch (R-UT) amendment to require unions and corporations to obtain permission from dues-paying members or shareholders before spending money on political activities. See ACU’s votes 4 and 5, 2001. ♦ FOR restricting the First Amendment (free speech) rights of independent groups. See ACU’s vote 23, 1997. ♦ FOR President Clinton’s nomination of Dr. David Satcher as U.S. Surgeon General. Among other things, Satcher opposed a full ban on partial-birth abortion. See ACU’s vote 1, 1998. ♦ FOR handouts to politicians, specifically taxpayer funding of presidential campaigns. See ACU’s vote 6, 1995. ♦ FOR handouts to politicians, specifically congressional perks such as postage and broadcast time funded by taxpayers. See ACU’s vote 13, 1996. ♦ AGAINST property rights and FOR unlimited presidential power, specifically by allowing President Clinton to implement the American Heritage Rivers Initiative, which he established by executive order, without congressional approval. See ACU’s vote 20, 1997. ♦ FOR affirmative action in federal contracts. See ACU’s vote 9, 1995. ♦ FOR an increase in the minimum wage, which, of course, increases unemployment among the young and poor. See ACU’s vote 16, 1996. ♦ FOR open-ended military commitments, specifically in regard to U.S. troops in Kosovo. See ACU’s vote 8, 2000. ♦ FOR the trial lawyers lobby, and specifically against a bill that would put common-sense limitations on the medical malpractice suits that increase health costs for all of us. (Of course! He’s been a trial lawyer himself for some three decades.) See ACU’s vote 18, 2002. ♦ FOR allowing the IRS to require political and policy organizations to disclose their membership—a vote against the constitutional rights of free association and privacy. (The Clinton Administration used such IRS intimidation against conservative groups that opposed them.) See ACU’s vote 11, 2000. ♦ AGAINST impeachment proceedings against President Clinton, specifically the reappointment and reauthorization of managers (drawn from the Republican membership of the House Judiciary Committee) to conduct the impeachment trial in the Senate. See ACU’s vote 1, 1999. There you have it. The actor who talks like a tough conservative has, in his real political life, voted in all these ways to increase the power of the federal government, limit the rights of taxpayers and individual citizens, and shut grassroots activists out of the political process. Ronald Reagan he is NOT! http://www.conservativesbetrayed.com/gw3/articles-latestnews/articles.php?CMSArticleID=1827&CMSCategoryID=19 I will be voting for Ron Paul.
Category: Elections

Now that Fred Thompson is in the race, please consider the following?

Can Thompson get the fascist, er, Republican nomination? And can he beat the Hillary/Obama team in the general election? Who would be his VP teammate?
Answer: Fred Thompson is not a real conservative. Conservatives who look to Thompson for salvation need to pause and consider his record—a record that includes these votes: Americans For Better Immigration rated his voting record with a "C" grade. http://www.betterimmigration.com/candidates/2006/prez08_gop1.html Tancredo, Ron Paul, and Hunter all have much more conservative voting records on immigration. http://www.betterimmigration.com/candidates/2006/prez08_gop2.html http://www.betterimmigration.com/candidates/2006/prez08_gop3.html As a confirmed member of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) Thompson would support the North American Union. http://www.eagleforum.org/column/2005/july05/05-07-13.html http://youtube.com/watch?v=kXevDajb2lo The CFR wants to allow Mexican trucks "unlimited access" to the United States, including the hauling of local loads between U.S. cities. The CFR calls for creating a "North American preference" so that employers can recruit low-paid workers from anywhere in North America. No longer will illegal aliens have to be smuggled across the border; employers can openly recruit foreigners willing to work for a fraction of U.S. wages. The CFR plan calls for massive U.S. foreign aid to the other countries. The burden on the U.S. taxpayers will include so-called "multilateral development" from the World Bank and the Inter-American Development Bank, "long-term loans in pesos," and a North American Investment Fund to send U.S. private capital to Mexico. As a proponent of free trade Thompson would support the the NAFTA Superhighway. http://news.yahoo.com/s/thenation/20070809/cm_thenation/20070827hayes_1 http://www.ontheissues.org/senate/Fred_Thompson.htm#Free_Trade "Indeed, the image of the highway, with its Chinese goods whizzing across the border borne by Mexican truckers on a privatized, foreign-operated road, is almost mundane in its plausibility. "Construction of the NAFTA highway from Laredo, Texas to Canada is now underway," read a letter in the February 13 San Gabriel Valley Tribune. "Spain will own most of the toll roads that connect to the superhighway. Mexico will own and operate the Kansas City Smart Port. And NAFTA tribunal, not the U.S. Supreme Court, will have the final word in trade disputes." He also voted: ♦ FOR restricting the rights of grassroots organizations to communicate with the public. See ACU’s vote 3, 1998. ♦ AGAINST an accelerated elimination of the “marriage penalty.” See ACU’s vote 10, 2001. ♦ AGAINST restraints on federal spending, specifically the Phil Gramm (R-TX) amendment to limit non-defense discretionary spending to the fiscal 1997 levels requested by President Clinton. See ACU’s vote 6, 1997. ♦ FOR the Legal Services Corporation, the perennial liberal boondoggle that provides political activism disguised as “legal services” to Democratic constituencies. See ACU’s vote 16, 1995, and vote 17, 1999. ♦ FOR corporate welfare, specifically the Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC). See ACU’s vote 23. 1999. ♦ AGAINST worker and shareholder rights, specifically the Hatch (R-UT) amendment to require unions and corporations to obtain permission from dues-paying members or shareholders before spending money on political activities. See ACU’s votes 4 and 5, 2001. ♦ FOR restricting the First Amendment (free speech) rights of independent groups. See ACU’s vote 23, 1997. ♦ FOR President Clinton’s nomination of Dr. David Satcher as U.S. Surgeon General. Among other things, Satcher opposed a full ban on partial-birth abortion. See ACU’s vote 1, 1998. ♦ FOR handouts to politicians, specifically taxpayer funding of presidential campaigns. See ACU’s vote 6, 1995. ♦ FOR handouts to politicians, specifically congressional perks such as postage and broadcast time funded by taxpayers. See ACU’s vote 13, 1996. ♦ AGAINST property rights and FOR unlimited presidential power, specifically by allowing President Clinton to implement the American Heritage Rivers Initiative, which he established by executive order, without congressional approval. See ACU’s vote 20, 1997. ♦ FOR affirmative action in federal contracts. See ACU’s vote 9, 1995. ♦ FOR an increase in the minimum wage, which, of course, increases unemployment among the young and poor. See ACU’s vote 16, 1996. ♦ FOR open-ended military commitments, specifically in regard to U.S. troops in Kosovo. See ACU’s vote 8, 2000. ♦ FOR the trial lawyers lobby, and specifically against a bill that would put common-sense limitations on the medical malpractice suits that increase health costs for all of us. (Of course! He’s been a trial lawyer himself for some three decades.) See ACU’s vote 18, 2002. ♦ FOR allowing the IRS to require political and policy organizations to disclose their membership—a vote against the constitutional rights of free association and privacy. (The Clinton Administration used such IRS intimidation against conservative groups that opposed them.) See ACU’s vote 11, 2000. ♦ AGAINST impeachment proceedings against President Clinton, specifically the reappointment and reauthorization of managers (drawn from the Republican membership of the House Judiciary Committee) to conduct the impeachment trial in the Senate. See ACU’s vote 1, 1999. There you have it. The actor who talks like a tough conservative has, in his real political life, voted in all these ways to increase the power of the federal government, limit the rights of taxpayers and individual citizens, and shut grassroots activists out of the political process. Ronald Reagan he is NOT! http://www.conservativesbetrayed.com/gw3/articles-latestnews/articles.php?CMSArticleID=1827&CMSCategoryID=19 I will be voting for Ron Paul.
Category: Elections

Question for my Obama vs. Ron Paul deliberations -- how far along is the North American Union agenda?

Can anyone provide a web link about progress made to date toward North American Union. This is an important issue for me to "seal the deal" as to switching my support from Obama to Ron Paul. I wish to evaluate for myself how close we are to NAU. I cannot find one with my Google searches. It seems there has been a blackout by the media on this topic.
Answer: North American Union is a term that has been used by think tanks postulating integration of the economy with free immigration of labor and merger of benefits etc. That is not official government policy, but the policy proposed by a think tank that does advise the government. The official government web page is www.spp.gov (the term is 'Security and Prosperity Partnership'.) It is easier to find details if you search it in Canadian sources such as the link on the Canadian consulate web page. That will tell you for example, that Canada and Mexico call the agreement between heads of state to streamline policy a 'treaty', but that 'it isn't called a treaty in the United States because of the special place a treaty holds in United States government' (or words to that effect.) What that dances around is that under US law treaties need to be ratified by Congress, and the SPP agreement was not. Calling it something other than a treaty to get around this issue is as disingenuous as the EU calling their treaty in Brussels not a 'Constitution' in order to avoid ratification by the populace in many countries, even though it covers virtually all the ground the failed 'Constitution' of the EU had covered. This mind set, as you see, is not restricted to the United States. If you go to spp.gov you are going to have to go between the lines. The main point you should easily be able to see is that the only true representation is of large industry, not individuals or small business who are cut out of the benefits of trade under these trade agreement based policies. The reason our Constitution prefers maximum government at the most local level is that that is where the individual can most easily impact policy. The other thing you should look up is the 'Texas Toll Road'. Over years, until just before the election, in fact, people like Obama were saying the NAFTA superhighway from Mexican ports run by the Chinese to Canada did not exist. Again, that wasn't its proper name, the Texas Toll Road is its proper name. It will be paid for by tolls going to a foreign country, will bypass all small towns servicing the highway, and is to facilitate moving labor from our 'expensive' ports that have to comply with environmental regulations and pay American wages to Mexican ports, and to Mexican truckers. Again, not just US but also individual Mexican workers will be hurt, because for security/terrorism reasons, the trucking will all be by 'trusted trade partners' (such as the one caught smuggling drugs across the border last year, but I digress....). These are huge trucking companies that purportedly can satisfy inspection and employee screening requirements. So the small business trucker/owner will be essentially eradicated south, as well as north, of the border. Note what similar impacts from NAFTA to the small farmer and small businessman in Mexico did to our immigration pressure. Now that they are planning eminant domain to take ranches that have been in families for 150 years, they can't deny the existance of the road, so they poo poo what it means. The idea is that if you can buy a product cheaper at walmart, you are better off, regardless of what happened to your job, your benefits, your education levels (if the free immigration of cheap labor aspects fully go into effect such as through legalization of millions here in a manner that allows adjustment to status under existing law which would give family chain migration). This mindset also ignores your ability to be represented in policy issues in your own country. (I have seen 'respected globalist papers' say things like 'with issues as big as these (trade giving upside potential in the trillions to international companies) we can't let policy get bogged down in arguments of sovereignity of the individual American. There is no place for that in this increasingly global world. To look up THAT sort of thing use terms like 'doha round' 'free trade' and 'globalist' ) There are a lot of conspiracy theories about this, but all it takes is lack of transparency and full access by large business with no access by the ordinary citizen for the ordinary citizen to be disenfranchised. That some untrue claims are made about the 'NAU' doesn't mean the basic problems don't exist in the SPP. Good luck with your research. PS, you can go to Youtube to search NAU, but you WILL get a lot of conspiracy stuff you have to weed out. It should be pretty obvious which info is credible, though. When there is no transparency and a clear lack of reporting on important issues, people will fill the void by making stuff up that fits their world view. None of this explains why on issues this important there is allowed such a lack of transparency and reporting, however.... http://www.statesman.com/news/content/news/stories/local/04/06/0406turf.html?cxtype=rss&cxsvc=7&cxcat=52
Category: Elections

Mexican truckers take continuing education courses to comply with ...

The courses are free, consist of 80 hours of intensive study and have been offered since 2008. NUEVO LAREDO, Mexico…. Mexican truckers who haul the trailers back and forth across the border in Laredo Texas are ...

How do you feel about Fred Thompson entering the race for president?

Do you support Thompson? Do you think he poses a threat for Guiliani? No one has really answered my question yet.... please defend your opinion and explain why you do or dont like Thompson and whether you agree or not to his stance on certain issues
Answer: Thompson might be able to take Giuliani's liberal supporters. Fred Thompson is not a real conservative. Conservatives who look to Thompson for salvation need to pause and consider his record—a record that includes these votes: Americans For Better Immigration rated his voting record with a "C" grade. http://www.betterimmigration.com/candidates/2006/prez08_gop1.html Tancredo, Ron Paul, and Hunter all have much more conservative voting records on immigration. http://www.betterimmigration.com/candidates/2006/prez08_gop2.html http://www.betterimmigration.com/candidates/2006/prez08_gop3.html As a confirmed member of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) Thompson would support the North American Union. http://www.eagleforum.org/column/2005/july05/05-07-13.html http://youtube.com/watch?v=kXevDajb2lo The CFR wants to allow Mexican trucks "unlimited access" to the United States, including the hauling of local loads between U.S. cities. The CFR calls for creating a "North American preference" so that employers can recruit low-paid workers from anywhere in North America. No longer will illegal aliens have to be smuggled across the border; employers can openly recruit foreigners willing to work for a fraction of U.S. wages. The CFR plan calls for massive U.S. foreign aid to the other countries. The burden on the U.S. taxpayers will include so-called "multilateral development" from the World Bank and the Inter-American Development Bank, "long-term loans in pesos," and a North American Investment Fund to send U.S. private capital to Mexico. As a proponent of free trade Thompson would support the the NAFTA Superhighway. http://news.yahoo.com/s/thenation/20070809/cm_thenation/20070827hayes_1 http://www.ontheissues.org/senate/Fred_Thompson.htm#Free_Trade "Indeed, the image of the highway, with its Chinese goods whizzing across the border borne by Mexican truckers on a privatized, foreign-operated road, is almost mundane in its plausibility. "Construction of the NAFTA highway from Laredo, Texas to Canada is now underway," read a letter in the February 13 San Gabriel Valley Tribune. "Spain will own most of the toll roads that connect to the superhighway. Mexico will own and operate the Kansas City Smart Port. And NAFTA tribunal, not the U.S. Supreme Court, will have the final word in trade disputes." He also voted: ♦ FOR restricting the rights of grassroots organizations to communicate with the public. See ACU’s vote 3, 1998. ♦ AGAINST an accelerated elimination of the “marriage penalty.” See ACU’s vote 10, 2001. ♦ AGAINST restraints on federal spending, specifically the Phil Gramm (R-TX) amendment to limit non-defense discretionary spending to the fiscal 1997 levels requested by President Clinton. See ACU’s vote 6, 1997. ♦ FOR the Legal Services Corporation, the perennial liberal boondoggle that provides political activism disguised as “legal services” to Democratic constituencies. See ACU’s vote 16, 1995, and vote 17, 1999. ♦ FOR corporate welfare, specifically the Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC). See ACU’s vote 23. 1999. ♦ AGAINST worker and shareholder rights, specifically the Hatch (R-UT) amendment to require unions and corporations to obtain permission from dues-paying members or shareholders before spending money on political activities. See ACU’s votes 4 and 5, 2001. ♦ FOR restricting the First Amendment (free speech) rights of independent groups. See ACU’s vote 23, 1997. ♦ FOR President Clinton’s nomination of Dr. David Satcher as U.S. Surgeon General. Among other things, Satcher opposed a full ban on partial-birth abortion. See ACU’s vote 1, 1998. ♦ FOR handouts to politicians, specifically taxpayer funding of presidential campaigns. See ACU’s vote 6, 1995. ♦ FOR handouts to politicians, specifically congressional perks such as postage and broadcast time funded by taxpayers. See ACU’s vote 13, 1996. ♦ AGAINST property rights and FOR unlimited presidential power, specifically by allowing President Clinton to implement the American Heritage Rivers Initiative, which he established by executive order, without congressional approval. See ACU’s vote 20, 1997. ♦ FOR affirmative action in federal contracts. See ACU’s vote 9, 1995. ♦ FOR an increase in the minimum wage, which, of course, increases unemployment among the young and poor. See ACU’s vote 16, 1996. ♦ FOR open-ended military commitments, specifically in regard to U.S. troops in Kosovo. See ACU’s vote 8, 2000. ♦ FOR the trial lawyers lobby, and specifically against a bill that would put common-sense limitations on the medical malpractice suits that increase health costs for all of us. (Of course! He’s been a trial lawyer himself for some three decades.) See ACU’s vote 18, 2002. ♦ FOR allowing the IRS to require political and policy organizations to disclose their membership—a vote against the constitutional rights of free association and privacy. (The Clinton Administration used such IRS intimidation against conservative groups that opposed them.) See ACU’s vote 11, 2000. ♦ AGAINST impeachment proceedings against President Clinton, specifically the reappointment and reauthorization of managers (drawn from the Republican membership of the House Judiciary Committee) to conduct the impeachment trial in the Senate. See ACU’s vote 1, 1999. There you have it. The actor who talks like a tough conservative has, in his real political life, voted in all these ways to increase the power of the federal government, limit the rights of taxpayers and individual citizens, and shut grassroots activists out of the political process. Ronald Reagan he is NOT! http://www.conservativesbetrayed.com/gw3/articles-latestnews/articles.php?CMSArticleID=1827&CMSCategoryID=19 I will be voting for Ron Paul.
Category: Current Events

Forced to vote for Fred Thompson?

I like him well enough. He a good person, not too many negatives and a pretty likeable guy. I think he can handle DC politics, domestic issues and foreign policy. However, the Democrats are forcing me to vote for him. Why? Their shrill attacks on him even before he annouced for the race. They fear him. Hes a bigger star than Rudy, more appealing than Obama and can CRUSH Hillary on just about anything. In the end, any person who causes the Liberals to scream like little girls must be pretty good. The last guy to do that was Reagan. Is there anybody better out there?
Answer: Fred Thompson is not a real conservative. Conservatives who look to Thompson for salvation need to pause and consider his record—a record that includes these votes: Americans For Better Immigration rated his voting record with a "C" grade. http://www.betterimmigration.com/candidates/2006/prez08_gop1.html Tancredo, Ron Paul, and Hunter all have much more conservative voting records on immigration. http://www.betterimmigration.com/candidates/2006/prez08_gop2.html http://www.betterimmigration.com/candidates/2006/prez08_gop3.html As a confirmed member of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) Thompson would support the North American Union. http://www.eagleforum.org/column/2005/july05/05-07-13.html http://youtube.com/watch?v=kXevDajb2lo The CFR wants to allow Mexican trucks "unlimited access" to the United States, including the hauling of local loads between U.S. cities. The CFR calls for creating a "North American preference" so that employers can recruit low-paid workers from anywhere in North America. No longer will illegal aliens have to be smuggled across the border; employers can openly recruit foreigners willing to work for a fraction of U.S. wages. The CFR plan calls for massive U.S. foreign aid to the other countries. The burden on the U.S. taxpayers will include so-called "multilateral development" from the World Bank and the Inter-American Development Bank, "long-term loans in pesos," and a North American Investment Fund to send U.S. private capital to Mexico. As a proponent of free trade Thompson would support the the NAFTA Superhighway. http://news.yahoo.com/s/thenation/20070809/cm_thenation/20070827hayes_1 http://www.ontheissues.org/senate/Fred_Thompson.htm#Free_Trade "Indeed, the image of the highway, with its Chinese goods whizzing across the border borne by Mexican truckers on a privatized, foreign-operated road, is almost mundane in its plausibility. "Construction of the NAFTA highway from Laredo, Texas to Canada is now underway," read a letter in the February 13 San Gabriel Valley Tribune. "Spain will own most of the toll roads that connect to the superhighway. Mexico will own and operate the Kansas City Smart Port. And NAFTA tribunal, not the U.S. Supreme Court, will have the final word in trade disputes." He also voted: ♦ FOR restricting the rights of grassroots organizations to communicate with the public. See ACU’s vote 3, 1998. ♦ AGAINST an accelerated elimination of the “marriage penalty.” See ACU’s vote 10, 2001. ♦ AGAINST restraints on federal spending, specifically the Phil Gramm (R-TX) amendment to limit non-defense discretionary spending to the fiscal 1997 levels requested by President Clinton. See ACU’s vote 6, 1997. ♦ FOR the Legal Services Corporation, the perennial liberal boondoggle that provides political activism disguised as “legal services” to Democratic constituencies. See ACU’s vote 16, 1995, and vote 17, 1999. ♦ FOR corporate welfare, specifically the Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC). See ACU’s vote 23. 1999. ♦ AGAINST worker and shareholder rights, specifically the Hatch (R-UT) amendment to require unions and corporations to obtain permission from dues-paying members or shareholders before spending money on political activities. See ACU’s votes 4 and 5, 2001. ♦ FOR restricting the First Amendment (free speech) rights of independent groups. See ACU’s vote 23, 1997. ♦ FOR President Clinton’s nomination of Dr. David Satcher as U.S. Surgeon General. Among other things, Satcher opposed a full ban on partial-birth abortion. See ACU’s vote 1, 1998. ♦ FOR handouts to politicians, specifically taxpayer funding of presidential campaigns. See ACU’s vote 6, 1995. ♦ FOR handouts to politicians, specifically congressional perks such as postage and broadcast time funded by taxpayers. See ACU’s vote 13, 1996. ♦ AGAINST property rights and FOR unlimited presidential power, specifically by allowing President Clinton to implement the American Heritage Rivers Initiative, which he established by executive order, without congressional approval. See ACU’s vote 20, 1997. ♦ FOR affirmative action in federal contracts. See ACU’s vote 9, 1995. ♦ FOR an increase in the minimum wage, which, of course, increases unemployment among the young and poor. See ACU’s vote 16, 1996. ♦ FOR open-ended military commitments, specifically in regard to U.S. troops in Kosovo. See ACU’s vote 8, 2000. ♦ FOR the trial lawyers lobby, and specifically against a bill that would put common-sense limitations on the medical malpractice suits that increase health costs for all of us. (Of course! He’s been a trial lawyer himself for some three decades.) See ACU’s vote 18, 2002. ♦ FOR allowing the IRS to require political and policy organizations to disclose their membership—a vote against the constitutional rights of free association and privacy. (The Clinton Administration used such IRS intimidation against conservative groups that opposed them.) See ACU’s vote 11, 2000. ♦ AGAINST impeachment proceedings against President Clinton, specifically the reappointment and reauthorization of managers (drawn from the Republican membership of the House Judiciary Committee) to conduct the impeachment trial in the Senate. See ACU’s vote 1, 1999. There you have it. The actor who talks like a tough conservative has, in his real political life, voted in all these ways to increase the power of the federal government, limit the rights of taxpayers and individual citizens, and shut grassroots activists out of the political process. Ronald Reagan he is NOT! http://www.conservativesbetrayed.com/gw3/articles-latestnews/articles.php?CMSArticleID=1827&CMSCategoryID=19 I will be voting for Ron Paul.
Category: Civic Participation

North Texas trucker could soon be freed from Mexican jail ...

22 hours ago ... A Mexican newspaper says a North Texas truck driver imprisoned in Mexico will be released — but there's a condition. The El Norte newspaper ...

North Texas trucker could soon be freed from Mexican jail | Infinity ...

A Mexican newspaper says a North Texas truck driver imprisoned in Mexico will be released — but there's a condition. The El Norte newspaper said Jabin Bogan of Irving will be set free if he pays a $1500 fine.

Texas Trucker Could Be Freed From Mexican... - ABC News http://t.co/D4tI9TTB
From: SamakoFillz - Source: dlvr.it

Texas trucker could be freed from Mexican prison http://t.co/nlWHqm1D
From: fox5newsedge - Source: dlvr.it

Texas trucker could be freed from Mexican prison: A Dallas truck driver who says he made a wrong turn into Mexico... http://t.co/s4RlZVeB
From: DailyCharleston - Source: dlvr.it

Texas Trucker Could Be Freed From Mexican... - ABC News: Texas Trucker Could Be Freed From Me... http://t.co/A77DYBfs #InstantFollowBack
From: GrapeBusiness - Source: twitterfeed

Texas trucker could be freed from Mexican prison: EL PASO, Texas (AP) -- A Dallas truck driver who says he m... http://t.co/bEEGh0XQ
From: axismedia - Source: twitterfeed

Texas trucker could be freed from Mexican prison: A Dallas truck driver who says he made a wrong turn into Mexic... http://t.co/PP1Zjm0u
From: ABC40_KRHD - Source: twitterfeed

Texas trucker could be freed from Mexican prison: A Dallas truck driver who says he made a wrong turn into Mexic... http://t.co/mg98gDub
From: FOX2News - Source: twitterfeed

WN Texas Trucker Could Be Freed From Mexican... - ABC News: Texas Trucker Could Be Freed From Mexican...ABC News... http://t.co/KbKg0FCA
From: TheWorldNews - Source: twitterfeed

Texas trucker could be freed from Mexican prison: A Dallas truck driver who says he made a wrong turn into Mexic... http://t.co/f7ACO1UI
From: FreshNewsOnline - Source: twitterfeed

Texas trucker could be freed from Mexican prison: A Dallas truck driver who says he made a wrong turn into Mexico... http://t.co/7Bl33t0E
From: okc_news - Source: dlvr.it

Texas trucker could be freed from Mexican prison http://t.co/3Y2obi59
From: KTULNatNews - Source: twitterfeed

Texas trucker could be freed from Mexican prison http://t.co/B9EdS0AG
From: thegunwire - Source: The Gun Wire WP

Texas Trucker Could Be Freed From Mexican... - ABC News http://t.co/iIZK2bQy
From: SamakoFillz - Source: dlvr.it

Texas trucker could be freed from Mexican prison http://t.co/I5THf2SZ
From: NewsChannel10 - Source: twitterfeed

Texas trucker could be freed from Mexican prison: A Dallas truck driver who says he made a wrong turn into Mexico... http://t.co/WvizyjWO
From: amarillojournal - Source: dlvr.it